Author Topic: New Technology  (Read 31302 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New Technology
« Reply #285 on: February 10, 2016, 07:18:PM »
I haven't read CALS book, but I do not understand why he decided to change what he originally thought. First we have to accept his findings then we dont, then we do again. its all very iffy.

Can you make an informed decision when you don't have all of the facts?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lebaleb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 884
Re: New Technology
« Reply #286 on: February 12, 2016, 09:20:AM »
Can you make an informed decision when you don't have all of the facts?

 I would love there to be some conclusive evidence in this case but there isn't.
None of us have all of the facts, we can only make informed guesses.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44339
Re: New Technology
« Reply #287 on: February 12, 2016, 10:41:AM »
There is a mountain of undisputed facts and evidence on the case. Online, in Youtube and in books. I mean the whole 2002 appeal is online.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: New Technology
« Reply #288 on: February 12, 2016, 10:53:AM »
 That " mountain " was built from a molehill !!

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New Technology
« Reply #289 on: February 12, 2016, 11:15:AM »
That " mountain " was built from a molehill !!

Where is the FORENSIC evidence against Sheila?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: New Technology
« Reply #290 on: February 12, 2016, 11:19:AM »
Where is the FORENSIC evidence against Sheila?






For starters,the blood on the Bible ( prints )

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New Technology
« Reply #291 on: February 12, 2016, 11:40:AM »





For starters,the blood on the Bible ( prints )

Even if we KNEW it was her blood, how does that prove she killed anyone?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: New Technology
« Reply #292 on: February 12, 2016, 12:25:PM »
Even if we KNEW it was her blood, how does that prove she killed anyone?






It would if that blood had been tested,as if not her blood,it would have been someone else's on her hand/s. So why wasn't it tested and investigated ? It was all part of the scene at the time ?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New Technology
« Reply #293 on: February 12, 2016, 01:24:PM »





It would if that blood had been tested,as if not her blood,it would have been someone else's on her hand/s. So why wasn't it tested and investigated ? It was all part of the scene at the time ?

So there STILL isn't ANY forensic evidence to link Sheila to the murders, just another 'if' and a 'but'!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: New Technology
« Reply #294 on: February 12, 2016, 02:08:PM »
So there STILL isn't ANY forensic evidence to link Sheila to the murders, just another 'if' and a 'but'!





About as much as there was from Jeremy,then ?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New Technology
« Reply #295 on: February 12, 2016, 02:30:PM »




About as much as there was from Jeremy,then ?

But you're willing to argue the case for Sheila's guilt WITHOUT ANY forensic evidence yet bleat on about how there is no forensic evidence to connect Jeremy?  ;D ;D ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: New Technology
« Reply #296 on: February 12, 2016, 03:25:PM »
But you're willing to argue the case for Sheila's guilt WITHOUT ANY forensic evidence yet bleat on about how there is no forensic evidence to connect Jeremy?  ;D ;D ;D ;D






Where is the forensic evidence connecting Jeremy anyway ?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New Technology
« Reply #297 on: February 12, 2016, 06:11:PM »





Where is the forensic evidence connecting Jeremy anyway ?

You've been told that a thousand times! Time for you to make the case for Sheila - forensic evidence that links Sheila?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: New Technology
« Reply #298 on: February 12, 2016, 06:35:PM »
You've been told that a thousand times! Time for you to make the case for Sheila - forensic evidence that links Sheila?





But I've NEVER seen or been convinced about this forensic evidence against Jeremy,so I can only gather that you're just playing for time when you state that there is----------hoping that the question will go away.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: New Technology
« Reply #299 on: February 12, 2016, 06:40:PM »




But I've NEVER seen or been convinced about this forensic evidence against Jeremy,so I can only gather that you're just playing for time when you state that there is----------hoping that the question will go away.

But you'll undoubtedly be jumping for joy  IF Jeremy's conviction was overturned and the circumstantial evidence -which will quite suddenly become acceptable- convicted Sheila.