Perhaps Jeremy Didn't Follow Nevill Dowstairs?

[maggie]

Well my forensic library was created in direct response to several posters saying the silencer was the only forensic evidence against Bamber.

With the library highlighting the vast amount of forensic evidence against Bamber, this will not be said again by current posters. However new posters may make this claim in future, as 'Wiggy' and 'Notsure' did when joining. Myself or anyone else can then direct them to the library.

It would confuse posters if my forensic library had posts and thread links supporting Bamber. However feel free to go into the individual links to discuss.

If you wish to create a forensic library showing Sheila was the killer, feel free. I will now amend the title of my library to include 'Jeremy' in it.

Adam It has been pointed out to you that we don't require anymore threads in the so called 'forensic library' by yourself or anyone else. We have more than enough and the forum is being swamped by unnecessary threads.
Myself and ngb1066 has asked you to resist the urge and warned you of the consequences of you continuing in this way never mind encouraging others to join in.
This is your last warning, would be grateful if you cooperate.
With thanks, maggie

[lemonhead]

Yes, he always does that - but glad it brought you out to post! Welcome, hope you don't go back into lurking.  . Which side do you favour - or are you undecided?

His guilt is apparent to me. I like to come see if anything new pops up. I don't really see any point in arguing with supporters though.  People have already done that far more competently than I could yet the net result of all such efforts came to naught. The supporters maintain their positions with religious zealousness no matter what is brought to bear against their claims. It's more peaceful to just lurk and take things in.


   

[lookout]

Nothing wrong in being a supporter !!

[Adam]

Adam It has been pointed out to you that we don't require anymore threads in the so called 'forensic library' by yourself or anyone else. We have more than enough and the forum is being swamped by unnecessary threads.
Myself and ngb1066 has asked you to resist the urge and warned you of the consequences of you continuing in this way never mind encouraging others to join in.
This is your last warning, would be grateful if you cooperate.
With thanks, maggie

Well I was responding to David's post.

You said several days ago I will get banned if I add threads or posts to my forensic library. Which was disappointing as it was created to assist everyone on the forum, and new posters who often join believing the silencer is the only forensic evidence against Bamber.

Nevertheless I have done what you asked and not added to it by adding older posts or threads, meaning the library is only half full. I will just have to refer to these older threads or posts individually, if anyone in future claims the silencer is the only forensic evidence against Bamber. Don't see why myself or other posters shouldn't quote old threads or posts. Rather than spend time typing the same thing.

The 2002 appeal report has turned into a recent treasure trove of forensic information, as my threads and posts have this month highlighted. Most of this information is in the library. What a pity that if I find even more evidence, it can't be added.

[Caroline]

Nothing wrong in being a supporter !!

he didn't say there was - bit defensive Lookout? 

[maggie]

Well I was responding to David's post.

You said several days ago I will get banned if I add threads or posts to my forensic library. Which was disappointing as it was created to assist everyone on the forum, and new posters who often join believing the silencer is the only forensic evidence against Bamber.

Nevertheless I have not added to it by adding older posts or threads, meaning the library is only half full. The 2002 appeal report has turned into a recent treasure trove of forensic information, as my threads and posts have this month highlighted. Hopefully I won't have to keep referring to these as well, if claims are made in future that the silencer is the only forensic evidence against Bamber.

Today I have pointed out that we don't need a thread on every detail of the case, many points can be dealt with within one thread.
Just do as you have been asked please, Adam.
You are not the only member of the forum with rights, everyone has to be taken into consideration. Thanks.

[maggie]

Hi Lemonhead, sorry to be a pain but it's tradition that new members introduce themselves in the foyer before general posting.
Would be grateful if you could post a few lines there explaining your interest in the case.
Cheers!

[lookout]

he didn't say there was - bit defensive Lookout? 

I'm wary,is that alright ?

[Adam]

Today I have pointed out that we don't need a thread on every detail of the case, many points can be dealt with within one thread.
Just do as you have been asked please, Adam.
You are not the only member of the forum with rights, everyone has to be taken into consideration. Thanks.

Well I believe my last five threads were on the crime scene forensic evidence of Neville, June, Nicholas/Daniel and Sheila. And the kitchen fight.  Using the 2002 COA report as an excellent reference.

I believed each crime scene and individual was important and different enough to warrant an individual thread. Putting all of these huge issues into one thread is too big an amalgamation in my view.

[Caroline]

Well I believe my last five threads were on the crime scene forensic evidence of Neville, June, Nicholas/Daniel and Sheila. And the kitchen fight.  Using the 2002 COA report as an excellent reference.

I believed each crime scene and individual was important and different enough to warrant an individual thread.

Nobody else does, it just ends up being countless threads about the same thing.

[maggie]

I am asking you to temper your threads and that's the end of it, it doesn't seem to matter how tolerant I am with you, against huge pressure from others, you continue to argue and ignore.
Just do as I ask or I shall ban you for a month, you are a pest.

[Adam]

Nobody else does, it just ends up being countless threads about the same thing.

Well each crime scene is vastly different for each individual. But each one just as important. No one has ever really quoted the 2002 appeal before either, which is an excellent source.

Putting them all into one thread is too big an amalgamation in my view. They are all huge and vitally important.

[Adam]

I am asking you to temper your threads and that's the end of it, it doesn't seem to matter how tolerant I am with you, against huge pressure from others, you continue to argue and ignore.
Just do as I ask or I shall ban you for a month, you are a pest.

Thank you Maggie.

I won't create another thread on the case this year.

[maggie]

Thank you Maggie.

I won't create another thread on the case,  this year.

Many will be pleased to hear you say that, however you know very well I am only asking for reasonable and considerate behaviour, not a complete ban on starting threads. I look forward to a better relationship from now on, thank you.

[Caroline]

Well each crime scene is vastly different for each individual. But each one just as important. No one has ever really quoted the 2002 appeal before either, which is an excellent source.

Putting them all into one thread is too big an amalgamation in my view. They are all huge and vitally important.

Adam, people quote from it all of the time - can't believe you said that!