Lemonhead, it's good to see you posting as opposed to lurking.
Sadly, Adam has become his own worst enemy -we can't ALL be wrong about this fact- he goad, taunts and insults just far enough below the radar that for a long time nothing was done. He's flooded the forum with fairly useless threads which amount to little more than "The Thoughts of Adam" presented as fact. He has no understanding of what forensic means yet bombards us with threads labelled such. He makes broad claims insisting or stating something as fact when it is only his opinion. It is a shame that something he's posted which IS of value, or gives credit elsewhere has become lost amongst his usual "style." However, I would like to point out that it does occur that someone makes a salient point which is ignored at the time but becomes taken up later when another poster might say something similar. That's just the way it is.
Well this post is goading. I will forward it onto NGB for his view.
Well my threads get big responses. Some hundreds of pages. The topics have never been discussed before. The forum was totally dead when I joined. You always respond to my threads. So strange that in you're opinion they are 'fairly useless'. You post on here from mid morning to late evening every day, but have only ever created one thread, so haven't really got anything to back up you're 'fairly useless' statement.
But thank you for this time using the mild 'fairly useless' phrase. It was disappointing you called my last poll 'f--king useless'. As well as call me a 'cretin' and suggested I was taking drugs. I had spent several minutes creating it and it came back with good results and a big response. Everyone agreeing Bamber had to fire the second shot into Sheila and that suffocating her was not an option for him.
Well unlike most other posters, including you, I don't call posters 'areseholes', 'liars', 'pratts', 'bullshitters', 'cretins','depraved' etc. This is aggressive goading of the worst kind and badly degrades the forum. But appreciate my well written responses are sometimes too clever and witty for their own good and the moderators are often all over me. Wit on the forum ? Perish the thought ! So I have just been trying to discuss the case, on both forums. But obviously have to respond to personal attacks such as this, in a civilised way.
Me not knowing what forensic evidence is ? That's a new one and a rather sweeping and offensive statement. I hope that is not the case, as a lot of my recent posts have been on forensic evidence. Taken from the 2002 appeal, and lots of other sources from my research. This was because several posters from both sides were still saying the silencer is the only forensic evidence against Bamber, which is clearly not the case. I hope my 'Forensic Evidence Library' and other recent forensic posts have assisted everyone.
Well obviously my opinion is not fact. But I can only give my opinion from looking at the facts. My post yesterday from the facts taken from the 2002 appeal gave the opinion that Sheila's condition was surely enough for a conviction without needing the silencer evidence. No one has agreed or disagreed with this. It will be good to get peoples opinions.
