Bamber's best option after the first shot did not kill Sheila:

[Caroline]

He did, after the first shot failed to kill her.

His first shot was not a terrible shot. It just didn't kill her.

Both shots WOULD have been fatal, the first just wasn't instant!! You have no idea how two shots were fired or why. You can ONLY speculate!!

[Adam]

Both shots WOULD have been fatal, the first just wasn't instant!! You have no idea how two shots were fired or why. You can ONLY speculate!!

They were fired with a gun. In and the around the head area. There is a picture of a shot Sheila. Have you not seen it.

Where does it say the first shot would have been fatal ? If she was able to go on walkabouts as people claim, why couldn't she have survived.

Are you xxxxx again, like you did last Saturday ?

[Caroline]

They were fired with a gun. In and the around the head area. There is a picture of a shot Sheila. Have you not seen it.

Where does it say the first shot would have been fatal ? If she was able to go on walkabouts as people claim, why couldn't she have survived.

Are you xxxxx again, like you did last Saturday ?

Read the autopsy you xxxxx! When did I lie?

You must really like being banned, I'd say you were on the edge again! 

[Caroline]

Two moderators confirmed it is acceptable to say this. After I reported xxxxxxx. So if someone says something incorrect about me.... Although I got called a xxxx when saying something about Bamber, rather than another poster.

Anyway Bamber wouldn't know whether Sheila was going to survive or not.

I couldn't give a flying crap what you were told - when did I lie? It's a simple enough question even for you!

[Jan]

Well my first page post suggests he knew he had the option of two shots prior to entrance into WHF.

He would know the rifle was weak and that one shot may not kill Sheila. So he read up to see if two shot suicides happen. Which they do.
 
So I don't see why he would be petrified. The police said he was very calm.

So weak that Sheila could use it then?

You do try and get the scene to fit your scenario.  Do you think Jeremy borrowed a book from the library then on faking a suicide and knew he would have to do two shots ? How meticulous . And then he went and ruined it all by telling his girlfriend ? Oh sorry soon to be ex girlfriend.

[Adam]

So weak that Sheila could use it then?

You do try and get the scene to fit your scenario.  Do you think Jeremy borrowed a book from the library then on faking a suicide and knew he would have to do two shots ? How meticulous . And then he went and ruined it all by telling his girlfriend ? Oh sorry soon to be ex girlfriend.

I can't change the crime scene.

Bamber simply may have investigated if two shot suicides happen, in case the first shot of a weak rifle did not kill her. Criminals do plan things.

[Jan]

I can't change the crime scene.

Bamber simply may have investigated if two shot suicides happen, in case the first shot of a weak rifle did not kill her. Criminals do plan things.

 

[Adam]

Well he had been telling his girlfriend for months beforehand. There was no point in trying to keep it secret afterwards.

[Jane]

I can't change the crime scene.

Bamber simply may have investigated if two shot suicides happen, in case the first shot of a weak rifle did not kill her. Criminals do plan things.

Unless you have some sort of proof that she didn't knock the rifle sideways as he took the first shot you're talking out of your rear end...................which for you, isn't unusual.

[Caroline]

I can't change the crime scene.

Bamber simply may have investigated if two shot suicides happen, in case the first shot of a weak rifle did not kill her. Criminals do plan things.

The likelihood of that happening is about the same as you being right about anything!! In case you can't work out the odds - that's a big fat zero!

[Adam]

Unless you have some sort of proof that she didn't knock the rifle sideways as he took the first shot you're talking out of your rear end...................which for you, isn't unusual.

I have no proof. I was not there. Or even born.

Unlike you who didn't like Julie's court dress and then decided Bamber was innocent.

[Adam]

The likelihood of that happening is about the same as you being right about anything!! In case you can't work out the odds - that's a big fat zero!

It wouldn't be hard to do.

I understand they had books in 1985.

[Caroline]

It wouldn't be hard to do.

I understand they had books in 1985.

The gun might be weak but not as weak as your argument.

[Jan]

Adam your version of Jeremy is quite an enigma

Clever enough to plan two shots
But stupid enough to tell his girlfriend
Clever enough to plan a call from his father
but stupid enough not to wait a while and make it a proper emergency call rather than dilly dally
Clever enough to LOCK a window behind him
but stupid enough to tell the police he could get in and out of the house
He was such a namby pamby he could not shoot rabbits
but could shoot his whole family and stand calmly next to police
He was not speaking to his mother ( according to you )
But he was happy to go round for supper.
Clever enough to totally dispose of any forensic evidence
But dumb enough to leave the silencer with a Blob of blood .

You are weaving an intricate personality .

And before you say anything there is a source that he was thoroughly tested face to face ( not by someone who had never met him , and he was not a psychopath.

[Jane]

I have no proof. I was not there. Or even born.

Unlike you who didn't like Julie's court dress and then decided Bamber was innocent.

Wasn't born?  My guess is you're a lot closer to 70 than 17. Are your fingers so weak and feeble -bit like you say about rifle- that you get the keys mixed up when it comes to your age. OR are you just a LIAR?