They are still withholding documentary evidence under pii which damages the case

[mike tesko]

The main point is this material should have been disclosed pre trial and the police have had repeated requests for disclosure over 30 years. They had another obligation to disclose pre 1988 and 2002 Appeals but still only gave partial disclosure.

In 2005 Andrew Hunter MP addressed Parliament regarding disclosure and was assured the CCRC had the powers to obtain missing information...

http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/in-parliament

The CCRC were told by Essex Police that the 'Call Logs could not be located' - as it says in the video  - this is Jeremy's alibi!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wu6L4Kvql9s

[mike tesko]

We have documents proving that there is a confidential PII file on Julie Mugford, Senior crown prosecutor's statement to 2002 appeal investigation...

http://twitpic.com/9cxwkf

[mike tesko]

Let's not forget that all material DNA exhibits were illegally destroyed by Essex Police despite a court order,  therefore placing all the more emphasis on documents being disclosed...

http://twitpic.com/a15oae

[mike tesko]

Letter from CPS to the City of London Police Investigation 1991, discussing documents attracting PII not to be disclosed to Defence...

https://goo.gl/photos/xwxAv6K9yvL2u9578

[mike tesko]

Essex Police told Jeremy it would be too costly to disclose between 2004-2007. Jeremy offered to pay Essex police for the work of disclosure and they refused

http://tinyurl.com/nu9sgo7

[mike tesko]

I was nominated by Jeremy and Ewen Smith, to attend Essex police head quarters, to research the contents of all the withheld / undisclosed material, but police refused. There were over two million documents unseen by that stage, as I recall...

[Jan]

I appears that he has a lot more documents but some are still not complete or are not the originals . I guess there is a way of checking originals to see if they have been tampered with?

[mike tesko]

I appears that he has a lot more documents but some are still not complete or are not the originals . I guess there is a way of checking originals to see if they have been tampered with?

I know, I have most of the original material. I really should do more than I am doing, and I should uploade it all, no matter how long it takes me...

[Jan]

As far as I can see the most important areas are
the silencer
the phone logs
Julies file.

[lookout]

That's about it Jan and the result doesn't appear to be cut and dried.

[lookout]

Just reading in my local rag that files are still being withheld from 1972 in the Shrewsbury 24 " case involving Ricky Tomlinson ( actor ) who was illegally imprisoned along with unionist colleagues during the building workers strike of that year.
There is a 30 year ceiling in the time that documents/files can remain to be " hidden ",but in Ricky's case it's well past those 30 years.The EXCUSE that the government are using is that the files are a national security issue !! 

[lookout]

3 years ago the " chiefs at Whitehall " said that files relating to the above case would be withheld for a further 10 years with the next review in 2021 !
So,as in Jeremy's case,these people would rather wait until the victims die than admit that mistakes were made resulting in MOJ's.

[lookout]

If it is found that ORIGINAL evidence had been withheld and was failed to be disclosed during Jeremy's trial,such as with the Guildford 4 and Stefan Kiszko,then the case should automatically be brought before the Court of Appeal. MANY besides the two that I've named were freed because of MOJ's through original evidence not being shown because the police and the prosecution failed to disclose it.