Anglolawyer's theory

[scipio_usmc]

It certainly has.How easy is it to cross an " o " to make it look like an " a " as the alteration shows-----Hoating.

I already referred you to this thread where Mike said it says heating:

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,6419.msg283310.html#msg283310

Unlike most here you actually trust Mike so why don't you ask him about it.  He has seen it close up and the other documents related to it which he declined to post. 

[lookout]

I already referred you to this thread where Mike said it says heating:

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,6419.msg283310.html#msg283310

Unlike most here you actually trust Mike so why don't you ask him about it.  He has seen it close up and the other documents related to it which he declined to post.

And I say it's an alteration of shooting. " Heating's " got nothing whatsoever to do with anything.
It was referring to the shooting in the kitchen,not the heating.

[lookout]

In the type-written document of the same number,1612,it CLEARLY states shooting !

[scipio_usmc]

In the type-written document of the same number,1612,it CLEARLY states shooting !

1) how do you know the type written document wasn't a defense created document?  Many of the typed things Mike posts is defense created.

2) how do you know that the action didn't encompass the entire kitchen attack on Nevill and that one of the elements they were looking at was the heating?

The action is from May 1986 so quite clearly not them looking at whether police shot anyone in the kitchen.  Their 1986 actions pertained to things raised after Vanezis criticized police and the people preparing the court prosecution wanted more answers.   

[lookout]

1) how do you know the type written document wasn't a defense created document?  Many of the typed things Mike posts is defense created.

2) how do you know that the action didn't encompass the entire kitchen attack on Nevill and that one of the elements they were looking at was the heating?

The action is from May 1986 so quite clearly not them looking at whether police shot anyone in the kitchen.  Their 1986 actions pertained to things raised after Vanezis criticized police and the people preparing the court prosecution wanted more answers.

Then why has shooting been altered to " heating " ? Which it clearly had been.

[scipio_usmc]

Then why has shooting been altered to " heating " ? Which it clearly had been.

It's far from clear that it has been altered.  Mike doesn't claim it has been altered and he saw the document closeup whereas all we can see is a snapshot taken with a phone from far away.  It seems odd you don't want to ask him since you trust him so much.   

[Caroline]

It certainly has.How easy is it to cross an " o " to make it look like an " a " as the alteration shows-----Hoating.

No it hasn't Lookout, even Mike said it says 'Heating' you can SEE it says 'Heating' and 'Hoating' isn't even a word. 

[lookout]

No it hasn't Lookout, even Mike said it says 'Heating' you can SEE it says 'Heating' and 'Hoating' isn't even a word. 

Why does it show/display heating in doc.1612 ?

[Jane]

Why does it show/display heating in doc.1612 ?

Nothing more sinister, I imagine, than good old human fallibility...................or illiteracy.

[lookout]

Nothing more sinister, I imagine, than good old human fallibility...................or illiteracy.

Or jiggery-pokery.

[Jane]

Or jiggery-pokery.

If you can explain what is the meaning of "hoating" I might be able to understand exactly what sort of jiggery-pokery you believe was happening.

[lookout]

If you can explain what is the meaning of "hoating" I might be able to understand exactly what sort of jiggery-pokery you believe was happening.

Everything EP did was an afterthought. They should have followed the old adage of : " You can fool all the people some of the time but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Abe.Lincoln.

[Jane]

Everything EP did was an afterthought. They should have followed the old adage of : " You can fool all the people some of the time but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Abe.Lincoln.

Which goes exactly NOWHERE to telling me what you believe "hoating" to mean OR why you thing jiggery-pokery is involved. C'mon, Lookout, even my lappy tells me it isn't a real word.

[Caroline]

Why does it show/display heating in doc.1612 ?

I don't know what document you are talking about but the cover of the one WE are referring to says HEATING.

[Caroline]

Which goes exactly NOWHERE to telling me what you believe "hoating" to mean OR why you thing jiggery-pokery is involved. C'mon, Lookout, even my lappy tells me it isn't a real word.

Of course t isn'r and it hasn't been altered.