Mystery of the presence of human blood both ends of the silencer, 13th August...

[mike tesko]

Fuck Fletchers theory of backspatter, fuck the prosecutions case, fuck Essex police, fuck the judiciary, a mans liberty hangs in the balance depending upon what the truth of this matter was, and turns out to be...

The jaws of the individual baffle plates were facing downward, not fucking upward. Look at 'Ron' Cooks photographs, it is unmistakeable, the Howard diagram, although accurately recording the direction of the jaws of the baffles as at 29th May 1986, had by that stage been turned head over heels, by the Conspirators, with a view of introducing the Fletcher theory of backspatter...

Think...

[David1819]

Fuck Fletchers theory of backspatter, fuck the prosecutions case, fuck Essex police, fuck the judiciary, a mans liberty hangs in the balance depending upon what the truth of this matter was, and turns out to be...

The argument was made that a .22 is unlikely to produce backspatter. so....

The only way you could disprove the backspatter is if you conduct ballistic experiments. Using the same model gun and moderator loaded with the same type of ammo. Start a simple experiment first by shooting a watermelon and if no moisture or bits of melon end up in the baffle plates then proceed to a more reliable experiment by shooting a live pig. If no blood ends up in the baffles plates after that you might be onto something.

[guest154]

The argument was made that a .22 is unlikely to produce backspatter. so....

The only way you could disprove the backspatter is if you conduct ballistic experiments. Using the same model gun and moderator loaded with the same type of ammo. Start a simple experiment first by shooting a watermelon and if no moisture or bits of melon end up in the baffle plates then proceed to a more reliable experiment by shooting a live pig. If no blood ends up in the baffles plates after that you might be onto something.

I'll pass on conducting that one.

[David1819]

I'll pass on conducting that one.

Why?

[Steve_uk]

Why?

Because it would cause unnecessary cruelty to a dumb animal.

[guest154]

Why?

I don't want to shoot a pig! :D

[mike tesko]

Tonight, is the hallowed eve', the spirit which is that of Sheila Caffell, is confirming that, Woodcock shot her upon his entry to the kitchen. She fled upstairs after regaining consciousness, fell again unconscious onto the bed, her body moved to the bedroom floor, rifle brought from the bedroom window, and she killed herself by way of a shot from that rifle. OK, we now know, she didn't kill herself, we know Jeremy hadn't killed her, so who did?

[mike tesko]

Tonight, is the hallowed eve', the spirit which is that of Sheila Caffell, is confirming that, Woodcock shot her upon his entry to the kitchen. She fled upstairs after regaining consciousness, fell again unconscious onto the bed, her body moved to the bedroom floor, rifle brought from the bedroom window, and she killed herself by way of a shot from that rifle. OK, we now know, she didn't kill herself, we know Jeremy hadn't killed her, so who did?

Police, did...

[David1819]

Because it would cause unnecessary cruelty to a dumb animal.

They were recently using live pigs for forensic analysis of bloodspatter in New Zealand. Its not unnecessary to sacrifice an animal for forensic science, specially when the results can exonerate people and solve crimes in the future.

[mike tesko]

They were recently using live pigs for forensic analysis of bloodspatter in New Zealand. Its not unnecessary to sacrifice an animal for forensic science, specially when the results can exonerate people and solve crimes in the future.

Shoot the Conspirators, save the innocent animals...

[Caroline]

They were recently using live pigs for forensic analysis of bloodspatter in New Zealand. Its not unnecessary to sacrifice an animal for forensic science, specially when the results can exonerate people and solve crimes in the future.

 

[maggie]

They were recently using live pigs for forensic analysis of bloodspatter in New Zealand. Its not unnecessary to sacrifice an animal for forensic science, specially when the results can exonerate people and solve crimes in the future.

Cannot support that, what makes humans so special.

[David1819]

If your a vegetarian and purchase no products that require animal testing then your thumbs down is valid otherwise its rather hypocritical

[David1819]

Cannot support that, what makes humans so special.

Its not acceptable to do dangerous scientific or medical experiments on humans, Unless your names Dr Mengele.

[Caroline]

If your a vegetarian and purchase no products that require animal testing then your thumbs down is valid otherwise its rather hypocritical

It's not hypocritical at all - A pic shot with a .22 rifle would suffer far more than if it was killed in a abattoir. Perhaps you could put yourself forward to make it completely 'like for like'  and leave the pig and the 'hypocrisy' out of it?