they did a crap job - hence the subsequent enquiry . If they had done their job properly then we would not be here now discussing the case
Well the media reported it as murder/suicide on the front pages.
Bamber would suggest to anyone who would listen it was Sheila.
Some police were suspicious from the beginning, but were overruled by Taff Jones, who later changed stance. A month after the crime when the evidence had been processed, an important witness came forward and more investigation was done, Bamber was charged.
The way supporters bang on, you would think the police had never changed stance on a case before. Bamber was certainly not happy and made a complaint in 1994, which was dismissed, Bamber reacting by making a'dirty protest'.
My recent thread had most people agreeing the police were correct and Bamber should not have been charged from day one.
People are here now because it was a vile and famous case. Bamber has been getting himself in the media for 30 years, making wild claims which have no supporting evidence. Which a tiny amount of people agree with.
He is now going on about his 'mate' Neville, 'mum's baked cakes' and being a 'mummies boy'. And of course the withheld documents which would amazingly prove his innocence. Again there is no supporting evidence of this.
