« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6   Go Down

Author Topic: Trudie being vague again:  (Read 8979 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #15 on: October 29, 2015, 10:55:PM »
Quote from: Adam on October 29, 2015, 10:51:PM
Trudie says Jeremy 'doesn't have a family that's rallying behind him'.

No Trudie, he doesn't.

Because he shot 5 of them and accuses the rest of stitching him up,  but that seems lost on her.   ;D
Logged

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #16 on: October 29, 2015, 11:08:PM »
It would be a surprise if after a long 1985 trial, two failed appeals, a dismissed complaint against the police & a CCRC rejection, the police released documents that showed Bamber's innocence. Thought they would have shredded it.

It seems that Bamber's cell with 2 million documents in hasn't come up trumps.
Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #17 on: October 29, 2015, 11:10:PM »
Quote from: mat on October 29, 2015, 10:55:PM
Because he shot 5 of them and accuses the rest of stitching him up,  but that seems lost on her.   ;D

That's why posting his mothers recipes didn't ring warning bells!  ::)
Logged
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #18 on: October 29, 2015, 11:12:PM »
Quote from: mat on October 29, 2015, 10:55:PM
Because he shot 5 of them and accuses the rest of stitching him up,  but that seems lost on her.   ;D

Did you see the video I posted on the silencer.

It justifies why Bamber would use a silencer. It negates virtually all sound from the rifle. Not surprised the twins and (almost certainly) Sheila didn't wake.

Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #19 on: October 29, 2015, 11:18:PM »
Quote from: Caroline on October 29, 2015, 11:10:PM
That's why posting his mothers recipes didn't ring warning bells!  ::)

We hear (on repeat) of all the people working for him - yet the only person publicly speaking is Trudi!  ;D


Quote from: Adam on October 29, 2015, 11:12:PM
Did you see the video I posted on the silencer.

It justifies why Bamber would use a silencer. It negates virtually all sound from the rifle. Not surprised the twins and (almost certainly) Sheila didn't wake.



Yes, I agree that the reason for using the silence was obviously to to make the shots quieter which would be possibly needed in a house whilst shooting in doors, but I don't know if that woke Sheila up or if she slept through shots.
Logged

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20877
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #20 on: October 29, 2015, 11:28:PM »
Quote from: Adam on October 29, 2015, 11:12:PM
Did you see the video I posted on the silencer.

It justifies why Bamber would use a silencer. It negates virtually all sound from the rifle. Not surprised the twins and (almost certainly) Sheila didn't wake.
Yes I was surprised what a difference it made.
Logged

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #21 on: October 29, 2015, 11:52:PM »
It would be a no brainer for Bamber to use the silencer.

And a 'curious coincidence' that human blood was found in it.
Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #22 on: October 30, 2015, 01:56:AM »
Quote from: Steve_uk on October 29, 2015, 11:28:PM
Yes I was surprised what a difference it made.

Why are you surprised?  If the difference wasn't appreciable there would be no reason to market them.  In any event videos don't tell the full story of what you hear in person.  A moderator lessens the report sufficiently to help protect ears from injury but will still be audible.

Logged
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #23 on: October 30, 2015, 06:24:AM »
Trudie Benjamin is basically saying the police are withholding evidence that would prove Bamber's innocence. Although she has provided no evidence of this or reason why the police would do this.

The police would have had this evidence 30 years ago but decided to change stance after one month and go for a very risky frame. Why they would do this I do not know.

This is a massively serious accusation. Which has Bamber's full support as TB says she engages with him on a regular basis.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2015, 06:47:AM by Adam »
Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #24 on: October 30, 2015, 06:28:AM »
Of course the other serious accusations are that Julie committed very serious perjury because he 'jilted her', and the relatives framed him because they wanted his money. Although the relatives would need the help of the lab technicians.
Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #25 on: October 30, 2015, 06:46:AM »
I've never read about a convicted criminal claiming to the media that the police are deliberately withholding evidence that would free them.

But if any prisoner was going to make a long term claim, it was Bamber.
Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #26 on: October 30, 2015, 11:08:AM »
After 30 years and hundreds of other avenues explored,  everything is now full steam ahead. To say the police are withholding evidence that would free Bamber.

Very distasteful.
Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #27 on: October 30, 2015, 11:09:AM »
N.B. Notice how EP said " no comment " when asked the reason about withheld files/documents ?
Logged

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44135
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #28 on: October 30, 2015, 11:39:AM »
Quote from: lookout on October 30, 2015, 11:09:AM
N.B. Notice how EP said " no comment " when asked the reason about withheld files/documents ?

EP are not going to get involved in a public spat with Bamber. That is what he would want to create more publicity.

EP did their job in 1985. The rest is for the DPP, jury, COA and CCRC to decide. 
Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Trudie being vague again:
« Reply #29 on: October 30, 2015, 11:53:AM »
Quote from: Adam on October 30, 2015, 11:39:AM
EP are not going to get involved in a public spat with Bamber. That is what he would want to create more publicity.

EP did their job in 1985. The rest is for the DPP, jury, COA and CCRC to decide.
That's you told Lookout  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6   Go Up
« previous next »