Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?

[maggie]

Justice says that after 32 years no one being able to say how Sheila committed the massacre 'proves nothing'.

I believe it's massive proof as a scenario is based on the undisputed crime scene evidence. Together with two alledged WHF phone calls Bamber said Nevill made.

However posters base their Bamber innocence on Julie identifying the twins or AE giving BC Nevill's wallet. That would not be sufficient to get the CCRC to look at the case for a third time.

I know you are desperate to know what Roch knows but I cannot help you there.
I do wonder if you have actually read his posts as he has stated in such posts that he has seen evidence that proves Sheila was involved.

As Roch is not a liar then we surely have to accept there may be some doubt there is no evidence proving Sheila was involved.

[JackieD]

Justice says that after 32 years no one being able to say how Sheila committed the massacre 'proves nothing'.

I believe it's massive proof as a scenario is based on the vast amount of undisputed crime scene evidence. Together with two alledged WHF phone calls Bamber said Nevill made.

However posters base their Bamber innocence on Julie identifying the twins or AE giving BC Nevill's wallet. These will not be sufficient to get the CCRC to look at the case for a third time.

Adam you have made over 16,000 posts can you give me some idea what you think is the percentage of regular posters on this forum who  believe Jeremy Bamber is guilty

[Roch]

Demand impossible proof - Disinformation shills sometimes will demand proof then ignore it when its presented, or continue to demand impossible proofs. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, they will deem the material irrelevant and demand unattainable proof that is virtually impossible for the opponent to retrieve

Sounds a familiar experience on here.

[Adam]

I know you are desperate to know what Roch knows but I cannot help you there.
I do wonder if you have actually read his posts as he has stated in such posts that he has seen evidence that proves Sheila was involved.

As Roch is not a liar then we surely have to accept there may be some doubt there is no evidence proving Sheila was involved.

A lot of people have information which shows Sheila committed the massacre. Mike, Roch, JackieD, Bill.

I bet it must be frustrating for them to not post it on here while other posters still incorrectly believe Bamber is guilty.

[Roch]

Part of the problem lays in that this is no longer just about Jeremy's guilt/innocence. There is woven into it many other potential cases of innocence/guilt each having an individual influence on Jeremy's status.

Hi Jane, I think that is a good way of looking at the case. Struck a chord when I read it.

[Roch]

A lot of people have information which shows Sheila committed the massacre. Mike, Roch, JackieD, Bill.

I bet it must be frustrating for them to not post it on here while other posters still incorrectly believe Bamber is guilty.

It's in the hands of CT / Legal.  I wouldn't bother worrying that there might be an appeal - as I think the current strategy is to stonewall stonewall stonewall by whatever means possible.

[Adam]

It's in the hands of CT / Legal.  I wouldn't bother worrying that there might be an appeal - as I think the current strategy is to stonewall stonewall stonewall by whatever means possible.

'Stonewall'. I know the feeling.

[Jane]

Hi Jane, I think that is a good way of looking at the case. Struck a chord when I read it.

Thanks Roch. I've not been fully involved, forum-wise, for the past 48 hours, so, at the moment, I'm very much looking in from the outside and taking a more detached view. Things have certainly moved on apace!!!

[maggie]

A lot of people have information which shows Sheila committed the massacre. Mike, Roch, JackieD, Bill.

I bet it must be frustrating for them to not post it on here while other posters still incorrectly believe Bamber is guilty.

Can't disagree with that.

[lookout]

What was it that Lord Denning once said ? " It's better to keep an innocent man serving a life sentence in prison, than for the legal system to be brought into disrepute ".

[Roch]

'Stonewall'. I know the feeling.

Thought I had better add - I do not know any information that David or Jackie have.  I dont have any information my self.  I'm not a researcher on the case and dont have contacts (i.e within CT or legal).  But I do keep in touch with Bill - which I started doing again after he came back on the forum after having read a post by David that mentioned him.

[Steve_uk]

A lot of people have information which shows Sheila committed the massacre. Mike, Roch, JackieD, Bill.

I bet it must be frustrating for them to not post it on here while other posters still incorrectly believe Bamber is guilty.

Yes let's face it you can't blame some of us for being a doubting Thomas.

[susan]

It is something I forecast Maggie, the way Scorpio went, I am not bothered I will keep in touch with my friends through email.  The biggest joke is someone impersonating a police officer to drum up support for a mass murderer. The lowest of the low everyone knows who it is.

Hi Justice who is impersonating a police officer do you mean Bill did not know he was a police officer

[JackieD]

Yes let's face it you can't blame some of us for being a doubting Thomas.

I have passed all the details of the policeman in question to Ngb including his  name and address

That's all I have to say

[susan]

Yes let's face it you can't blame some of us for being a doubting Thomas.

Hi Steve don't be a doubting Thomas keep an open mind and wait and see what happens that is what I am doing I know Roch too well not to believe him and Jackie has been so involved in the case she will be in the know and we all know David found I think a document which has gone to Jeremy's Legal Team.