Colin writes:
It was really my unnatural responses that first made me apportion blame-as a way of avoiding my own conditional shame-and the fact that, on some level, I believed it must really be my fault. My initial blame was a way of avoiding that fact. It had seemed to me that I only had two options: either to beat myself up or to point my finger at someone else who fitted that image. Another option, which was not then apparent to me, was to step outside of it altogether and tell myself that I don't have to identify with either. That's not easy.
There are also times we have very good reason to blame or feel shame: my handling of our marriage breakdown would be a perfect example-and there would be occasions that it would bubble to the surface again, as I would soon discover. But how I deal with it within myself is what changes.
Anyway I decided to write to Jeremy at Wormwood Scrubs, where he had been imprisoned since the trial, in the hope that he might furnish me with some of the last pieces of the jigsaw puzzle-and in a sense he did-but I was far from prepared for his response. It brought me back to reality with a jolt. It was written on 16 August 1988:
DEAR COLIN,
I READ THE ARTICLE IN YESTERDAY'S INDEPENDENT WITH MUCH SADNESS,THE SAME SADNESS I ALWAYS FEEL WHEN I READ ABOUT YOU AND WHAT YOU'VE BEEN THROUGH IN THE LAST THREE YEARS.
YOUR LETTER TODAY, COLIN, WAS I'M AFRAID A TOUCH PREMATURE.YOUR WRITING TO ME HOPING, I GUESS, FOR THE LAST FEW PIECES OF THE JIGSAW SO THAT YOU MAY HOLD THE PICTURE OF WHAT HAPPENED IS NOT POSSIBLE. IF I COULD FURNISH YOU WITH WHAT YOU WANTED THEN I WOULD GLADLY DO SO-WHATEVER HAPPENED THAT FATEFUL NIGHT WILL NEVER BE FULLY EXPLAINED, IN FACT YOU COULD PROBABLY TELL ME MORE THAN I COULD YOU.
THE PAPER DID MENTION IN THE ARTICLE YESTERDAY THAT I WAS APPEALING AND NO DOUBT YOU KNEW THAT ANYWAY. HOW ARE YOU GOING TO REACT WHEN THEY QUASH MY CONVICTION, COLIN, BECAUSE IT'S VERY PROBABLE THEY WILL DO SO? YOU MAY BELIEVE ME GUILTY, YOU MAY NOT, BUT I HOPE THAT IF NOTHING ELSE YOU'LL TRY AND KEEP AN OPEN MIND BECAUSE AT MY APPEAL I WILL PROVE MY INNOCENCE AND BY DOING THAT THE CORNER-STONE OF THE PROSECUTION EVIDENCE WAS FABRICATED, BY WHOM I CAN'T PROVE YET AND IT'S NOT NECESSARY TO DO SO FOR MY APPEAL BUT EVENTUALLY I'LL FIND OUT BECAUSE IT CAN ONLY BE ONE OF FIVE PEOPLE. IT SOUNDS LIKE I'M TALKING RIDDLES AND I'M SORRY THAT I CAN'T EXPLAIN IN A LETTER TO YOU. IT SEEMS SO POINTLESS ME SENDING YOU THIS LETTER AS IT'LL ONLY ADD TO YOUR CONFUSION BUT FOR YOU TO WRITE TO ME MUST HAVE TAKEN A GREAT DEAL SO MY REPLYING IS THE LEAST I CAN DO...