So you are somehow suggesting my reconstruction is necessarily wrong?
I don't see how.
1. Phone off hook.
2. Sheila with gun on body and neck wounds consistent with self delivery
3. Cartridge cases in found locations.
4. Menstrual blood on knickers in bucket on kitchen floor.
5. Tampon in body, and complement of tampax in lounge.
6. Downward shots to mouth as though shooter on landing and Nevill below on stairs.
7. June shot while clearly asleep.
One of the problems confronting reconstructionists is that people customarily paint with the broad brush, everything is possible, but this is nonsense, one and only one exact sequence occurred.
A reconstruction will make sense of most evidentiary data points, seldom all.
Nevill was most of the way upstairs when turned back by gun fire.
Is this compatible with " never upstairs"? I think it is, but I am interested in what you mean Lookout.
There was no sign nor mention of Neville's day clothes anywhere. I can only assume that when he returned from his nightly ritual of taking the dogs out,having a shower,in the downstairs bathroom,donning the night clothes then having a quiet G&T and a smoke in the lounge,that this is what he did before retiring to bed.Except for that night he didn't get as far as going up the stairs.
When Sheila was at her flat in Maida Vale,it wasn't unusual for her to ring her father in the early hours and then talk to him until dawn broke,and whether,at the time ,her father had been in bed during those times,I don't know,but he'd obviously take the call downstairs so as not to disturb June ( who was a light sleeper )
The night of the tragedy would be no different if Sheila had wanted to talk to her father,except that he was already there and the kitchen was where they both were.
What I want to know was what direction was the gun cupboard in relation to the settle ( monks seat ) which was nearest to the kitchen ?
None of Neville's blood was found in the bedroom,or the stairs. It was all downstairs.