I don't really see how it matters either.
With regards to the tampax box found in the living room, it strikes me as being out of place. It's not something that you would expect to have been left lying around.
Could Jeremy have placed it there along with a toy gun?
Hartley:
I have little idea of your interest in this case, but let me suggest you seem to require affirmation of the guilty verdict, and accordingly will use band aids to patch the case.
Attention must be drawn to the bloody knickers in the bucket in the kitchen, and the half tampax that the policeman I posted earlier, said was missing, ie the cotton and string loop that were inside Sheila's body when she shot herself.
I have been unable in my research to find anyone who has ever had a daughter leave menstrual blood on knickers soaking in a bucket on a kitchen floor before going to bed.
This is so singular that an alternative explanation must be found. This is Bayes, though I hold little regard for this statistical methodology. It is a device employed to add authenticity to the tin labelled common sense, largely redundant, but enlivens the notion of expert witness.
So we typically might multiply probabilities, I get murdered, I leave my knickers soaking in a bucket in my mother's kitchen and leave a tampon applicator in her lounge, then go to bed, all on the same night.
My analysis inverts this to say these matters are closely causally related, I was interrupted after putting the knickers in the bucket, had an argument with he who interrupted me, he was party to a discussion declaring me an unfit mother, so I seized an available and loaded gun and shot the mother fuckers.
The bucket and tampax bear silent witness.
Please Hartley, bring to the discussion an explanation that contradicts this, but explains a young woman retiring to bed after leaving a disgraceful and negligent hygiene construct.
