It is interesting to see you all rationalise an impossible position.
Jeremy Bamber did not do this crime. On Injustice Anywhere forum the bullet trajectories have been analysed proving that Sheila killed the family and then herself. Accordingly Jeremy is vested with the identical rights in theory as Colin. Colin is a piece of work to decide Jeremy did this because Sheila would have preferred to die next to her children. This is nonsense and psychologically incorrect, her dispute was with June, not Nevill or the children. From New Zealand we are well versed with the parallel case, where Robin Bain shot his family and then himself when they were outing him for incest. There is a similar deluded crowd as here that have twisted the forensics and motivations to support the comfort of authority, in making a false crime reconstruction.
Well I am not familiar with bullet trajectories or with the website you quote, but I would have thought it almost impossible to determine whether a sick, gullible young woman sitting down shot herself or someone else was holding the weapon at the time. How right you were that her beef was with June and not her children, which is why she would have stayed in the children's bedroom and killed herself there, possibly even hugging the dead corpses as Police arrived had she been experiencing the psychotic episode the Jeremy supporters are so fond of maintaining she was in the grips of.
As for Robin Bain you are similarly misinformed. Here was a man whose every action was to put his family first, if you bothered to read any of the literature on the case. His daughter, Arawa, was following in his footsteps as a teacher after becoming Head Girl of her school, whilst David who had suffered most academically in the compound at Papua New Guinea had struggled to cope at university upon the family's return to New Zealand and was more like his nonentity mother in character. Thus the fake typed suicide note claiming that "
You are the only one who deserved to stay" is a complete joke, or would be had we not been discussing the death of five.
You are right in one respect to link the crimes. Both were committed by young men who felt they were being marginalized, pushed out of their parents' affection and were struggling to cope with the demands of day-to-day existence. Both were nonentities who craved something better, which in their minds could only be achieved by the extirpation of their families: in David's case through the trancing he had learned through his mother and Jeremy with the cocktail of drugs he ingested to get him through that wicked night of which he has since lost all consciousness, hence these pathetic periodic letters which dupe only the uninformed and the diehards, however sincere the latter group may profess to be.
