Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?

[lookout]

The CT are obviously building up to an " explosion " of evidence by showing their mundane Vlogs. I've always had the feeling that they're holding back,purposely in case anyone jumps in and steals their thunder first.
They're quite at liberty to hold back on any information that is readily available and the Vlogs are done just to remain in the public eye until such times that this information is ready for release.
I suppose it's a case of rather the Vlogs than a complete and frustrating silence, as a way of filling time and still holding the publics interest in the case.
When the time is right,we'll hear soon enough.

[lookout]

Can you imagine what the brainless idiots in the media would make of any leaks of information or evidence which appeared in fits and starts? They'd have a field day using just half a story and putting their own theories in just to fit whatever agenda they favoured-------------like flies round a heap of manure.

I was reading the Keith Blakelock murder and the investigation into that was truly abysmal. David Rose was the journo. It took years before that was finalized.

[John]

I will make a prediction or two.  There is no withheld information capable of clearing Jeremy Bamber and all this talk about new evidence is simply that, TALK!     And just for good measure Trudi et all will fade away like most others have done over the years.

[lookout]

Not true John.

The fact that qualified lawyers have helped out over the months on a pro-bono basis says it all because who,in their right mind,would bother doing anything for an " already convicted murderer ?" Wouldn't that go against their ethics and everything they've trained,studied and qualified for ?
I don't see EP shouting from the rooftops what their own investigations threw up,or that they haven't got any " hidden " information.
 

[John]

Not true John.

The fact that qualified lawyers have helped out over the months on a pro-bono basis says it all because who,in their right mind,would bother doing anything for an " already convicted murderer ?" Wouldn't that go against their ethics and everything they've trained,studied and qualified for ?
I don't see EP shouting from the rooftops what their own investigations threw up,or that they haven't got any " hidden " information.

We all know why they get involved and it isn't for the love of JB.


ps   You think lawyers have ethics?? 

[lookout]

We all know why they get involved and it isn't for the love of JB.


ps   You think lawyers have ethics??  -------------Weeeeeelllll,some of them.

[lookout]

I think EP thoroughly enjoyed giving themselves a pat on the back for this ( phoney ) conviction !!

[John]

I think EP thoroughly enjoyed giving themselves a pat on the back for this ( phoney ) conviction !!

In order to claim that you have to have a reason, something which is sorely lacking.

[lookout]

In order to claim that you have to have a reason, something which is sorely lacking.

All those involved needed to hang on to their jobs because of their previous very poor detection work.
The Diane Jones case,for instance.

[Jane]

All those involved needed to hang on to their jobs because of their previous very poor detection work.
The Diane Jones case,for instance.

If the perpetrator of that crime was who they believed it to be, they never stood a chance. She'd been missing 4/5 days before her disappearance was reported, by which time every trace of evidence could have been removed by what may have been a master craftsman.

[lookout]

If the perpetrator of that crime was who they believed it to be, they never stood a chance. She'd been missing 4/5 days before her disappearance was reported, by which time every trace of evidence could have been removed by what may have been a master craftsman.

The case is one of many cold cases which remain unsolved. The DJ one I think has re-opened this year, so given the advancement of forensic science and all it entails,it won't be written off.

[Jane]

The case is one of many cold cases which remain unsolved. The DJ one I think has re-opened this year, so given the advancement of forensic science and all it entails,it won't be written off.

I can't find any information to establish what you say and there's certainly not been anything about it in the local rags. I think it's 33 years in July since it happened.

[lookout]

I can't find any information to establish what you say and there's certainly not been anything about it in the local rags. I think it's 33 years in July since it happened.

The case was re-reported in March this year so I can only assume that after 33 years,it's also being re-investigated.

[Jane]

The case was re-reported in March this year so I can only assume that after 33 years,it's also being re-investigated.

It seems that "new" evidence came to light in 2003 but there is no information of anything since then.

[lookout]

It seems that "new" evidence came to light in 2003 but there is no information of anything since then.

We'll have to see how far they get with that one,with their " new " evidence.