0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Just from discussion with people outside of the forum.It's a relatively unimportant point with no impact on the case whatsoever.
It is important Hartley.Would that person be Ann?
Who you led you to believe Hartley?
Just word of mouth from people whom you do not know.Accept it and take it on board, or don't.I think you was expecting a different answer when asking about JB going in to WHF and the impact on other family members.
I thought it was well known.
Enlighten me Jane.
I don't know how I can, Buddy. It's just something I know. If I'd thought about it, I'd have assumed it was common knowledge. It's no big deal. What's with the cross examination?
Just say what you know Jane. It is a big deal. This is a forum where we cross examine, no offence intended.
If you've read what H says -and you clearly have- you know as much as I know. Cross examine someone else to see if they know.[/quoteBowed out then Jane?
Quote from: Jane J on October 18, 2016, 05:52:PMIf you've read what H says -and you clearly have- you know as much as I know. Cross examine someone else to see if they know.[/quoteBowed out then Jane?If you insist.
Is it not true that if Jeremy had taken on WHF the boutflours would have been indebted?
I can see that JB had been " guilty " before he was even charged ! Sticks out a mile.
Neville owned the land the Eaton's were farming on. They were planning to buy it off Neville when they had the money. So by default they would be indebted to Jeremy instead of Neville.WHF does not really come into the equation.