Neville's call to Jeremy. A 1% likelihood ?

[Caroline]

There is only 1 person I have seen making this claim- Adam.  If anyone else agrees with him I missed it.

That would be as rare as hens teeth!!

[Jane]

There is only 1 person I have seen making this claim- Adam.  If anyone else agrees with him I missed it.

Anyone who thinks he carried her is a fool.  If he did wake her up and she didn't leave her room to try to get away from him then he dragged her out at gunpoint.

 

SUCH a relief to know WE don't fall into the above category, Caroline .

[Caroline]

SUCH a relief to know WE don't fall into the above category, Caroline .

On this occasion 

[Jan]

oh be assured - Skippy regards us all as fools - every one of us .

[Caroline]

oh be assured - Skippy regards us all as fools - every one of us .

Well, that would only matter if you cared. To be honest, I think he seems a lot less prickly lately.

[Adam]

So just to clarify, can you confirm that you don't think he A) Put the rifle down on the bed, picked up a sleeping/dozy Sheila, carried her through to the master bedroom, put her down in a seated position on the floor and ordered her not to move, whilst he went back to get the rifle to kill her with, or B) Stuck the rifle between his legs, picked up a sleeping/dozy Sheila and waddled with her into the master bedroom where he put her down and shot her, or C) He woke/roused a sleeping/dozy Sheila, gave he the rifle to hold for him whilst he picked her up and carried her to the master bedroom where he put her down and shot her.

Everyone is assuming Sheila woke up. There is no reason why she would wake. Thread already created. The twins didn't wake.

If she didn't wake, she was either lead or carried away from her bed. She had to be as she was the one being framed.

Going back for the rifle ? It would be next to him and Sheila on Neville's bed.

[Adam]

A fireman's lift is quite easy.

It is.

Or if Sheila was laying on her back he just needed to put one arm under her knee and the other arm under her back. And carry her ten feet.

Why would she wake and be kicking and screaming ?

[maggie]

Adam I have removed your post to Jane concerning the editing of a previous post because it was offensive and unnecessary.
After editing I did ask you to leave it at that and not drag it up in the future but it seems you couldn't resist.

[maggie]

It is.

Or if Sheila was laying on her back he just needed to put one arm under her knee and the other arm under her back. And carry her ten feet.

Why would she wake and be kicking and screaming ?

Bcause that's what people do when they are picked up when sleeping.

[Jane]

Adam I have removed your post to Jane concerning the editing of a previous post because it was offensive and unnecessary.
After editing I did ask you to leave it at that and not drag it up in the future but it seems you couldn't resist.

Thank-you, Maggie. Offensive and unnecessary is the perfect way of describing him...................but I won't drop names

[Adam]

Thank-you, Maggie. Offensive and unnecessary is the perfect way of describing him...................but I won't drop names

I just thought it was appalling behaviour. Calling another poster 'brain dead'.

I don't call current or former supporters names when they fight against all the evidence.

[maggie]

Can you not speak to me on the main forum. Unless it is about the case.

You edit other peoples posts. Upon request. But never say anything to them on the main forum.

However whenever you edit or remove my post, you always announce it on here.

I just thought it was appalling behaviour from an elderly poster and former moderator. Calling another poster 'brain dead'.

I shall speak to you any way I choose just as you speak to others in the same way.  Why was it necessary to drag that up, it was all over and done with a few days ago and I asked you not to mention it on the forum but you just can't help yourself.  You were the one who brought it up.  It was goading Adam and you know it.

[Jane]

Can you not speak to me on the main forum. Unless it is about the case.

You edit other peoples posts. Upon request. But never say anything to them on the main forum.

However whenever you edit or remove my post, you always announce it on here.

I just thought it was appalling behaviour from an elderly poster and former moderator. Calling another poster 'brain dead'.

Perhaps you could enter into a contract in which you agree not to talk about the things your posts have been removed for simply so you can take the opportunity to mention them again. I think it's only courteous to tell someone why posts have been removed or edited. They may not be bright enough or too arrogant to work it out for themselves.

[guest154]

I just thought it was appalling behaviour. Calling another poster 'brain dead'.

I don't call current or former supporters names when they fight against all the evidence.

Bamber has nicknames for some of his supporters (confirmed by a recent book) Maggie edited out me using one of the nicknames the other day. 

Sometimes it's best just to accept it and move on, or if there is a major issue speak with NGB about it. If April called you braindead then you should be thankful, people have been called worse.

[Caroline]

Can you not speak to me on the main forum. Unless it is about the case.

You edit other peoples posts. Upon request. But never say anything to them on the main forum.

However whenever you edit or remove my post, you always announce it on here.

I just thought it was appalling behaviour from an elderly poster and former moderator. Calling another poster 'brain dead'.

All you ever do is goad other people, personally, you don't bother me but I can see why you annoy other people. I'm not sure what impression you are trying to portray but I don't think you realise how badly you come across. It might even be entertaining (at least) if you were even remotely amusing or informative.