Author Topic: Campaign to get original contents of PS Woodcock statement, set to solve case...  (Read 21094 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Mike said the child was born before the murders.


OK, so WHY the secrecy? He'd made no formal commitment to Julie -in fact he'd broken one- he was seeing at least ONE other woman!! and the "baby mother" doesn't appear to be any of the named females in his life. Bottom line is that he was a free agent.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Thanks for that Mike- so this means she can't have just been a one night stand?

Certainly not a one night stand...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076

OK, so WHY the secrecy? He'd made no formal commitment to Julie -in fact he'd broken one- he was seeing at least ONE other woman!! and the "baby mother" doesn't appear to be any of the named females in his life. Bottom line is that he was a free agent.

Well, it can't be Julie or  Virginia or Anji Greaves (he saw those two post murders). It can't have been Sue Ford because he husband would have had something to say! We would know if it were Liz Rimmington and besides, she thought he was guilty. Have I missed anyone?
« Last Edit: October 24, 2015, 07:04:PM by Caroline »
Few people have the imagination for reality

Online lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48671
Even the fact that grannie made provisions would have been contested-------------successfully.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Well, it can't be Julie or  Virginia or Anji Greaves (he saw those two post murders). It can't have been Sue Ford because he husband would have had something to say! We would know if it were Liz Rimmington and besides, she thought he was guilty. Have I missed anyone?


Susan Battersby? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Online lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48671
The original will would have been made null and void anyway when the will was changed. Even a codicil wouldn't have made any difference. 

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
By the beginning of 2004, June Bambers grand daughter, and Mabel Speakmans, great grand daughter, was not receiving any support at all from the relatives...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
I see a problem with the latest will of Mabel Speakmam...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
By the beginning of 2004, June Bambers grand daughter, and Mabel Speakmans, great grand daughter, was not receiving any support at all from the relatives...

Without a name on a birth certificate how would they know she was who it was claimed she was?

Online lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48671
 Nobody is obliged to receive any payment/support once they turn 18 or 21.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
DNA test has already been completed I was informed, prior to 2003, confirming paternity...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
After confirmation that Jeremy had fathered a daughter, there was a leak of confidential information, and the child's mother was hounded by the press, for a period of six months, but took legal action and has since been left alone. The taking of the legal action by the mother of Jeremy's daughter, it effected the manner with which Jeremy pursued the civil case against the relatives in the Mabel Speakman claim. This action served to deprive June Bambers grand daughter, and Mabel Speakmans great grand daughter from her rightful entitlement as a benefactor in the estates of June Bamber, and her mother, Mabel Speakman - it angers me that it has come down to this. The way I see it, it has turned into another massive injustice, on the grand daughter, and great grand daughters, behalf...
« Last Edit: October 24, 2015, 10:05:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
After confirmation that Jeremy had fathered a daughter, there was a leak of confidential information, and the child's mother was hounded by the press, for a period of six months, but took legal action and has since been left alone. The taking of the legal action by the mother of Jeremy's daughter, it effected the manner with which Jeremy pursued the civil case against the relatives in the Mabel Speakman claim. This action served to deprive June Bambers grand daughter, and Mabel Speakmans great grand daughter from her rightful entitlement as a benefactor in the estates of June Bamber, and her mother, Mabel Speakman - it angers me that it has come down to this. The way I see it, it has turned unto another massive injustice, on the grand daughter, and great grand daughters behalf...

Which press? Had that happened it would have appeared at least one newspaper but there is nothing on record.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
DNA test has already been completed I was informed, prior to 2003, confirming paternity...

How kind of you to make enquiries on my behalf. When I asked you about it yesterday, you said "Now, how would you expect me to know such details?" I guess the answer would be for you to do what you've just done. Ask the question.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318

Susan Battersby? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Barbara Wilson?

Princess Diana?