This is the way all the doubting Thomas's must feel about the manner with which the 13 page witness statement (that only consists of 10 pages) of PS Woodcock has been produced:
(1) - its just a mistake that the most experienced firearm officer to enter the main kitchen as part of the raid team, describes the kitchen table to be overturned, when by reference to police photographs which were taken two and a half hours later, show the same table standing upright on its four legs, and with crockery and utensils upon it. It's just a mistake, by jove...
(2) - its just a mistake, that it states that the witness statement he makes consists of 13 pages, yet there is only 10 pages. It's just a mistake...
(3) - its just a mistake, that the entire contents of page 5 have been retyped by a different typeset, and inserted into the main body of the incomplete 13 page statement that only has 10 pages. It's a mistake...
(4) - its a mistake, that the contents of the original page 5 which was originally typed out in the same typeset as pages, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, is missing, and has not been yet accounted for. It's a mistake...
(5) - its a mistake, that for over 30 years, we still do not yet know, whether or not the 3 missing pages of evidence (being the difference between the total numbers of pages stated, and the actual number of pages, disclosed) ran consecutively with one another, or were numbered randomly, in which case, what if any of the disclosed 10 page numbers, have been renumbered? It's a mistake...
(6) - its a mistake, that Essex police are withholding the original contents of PA Woodcocks 13 page witness statement. It's a mistake...