Campaign to get original contents of PS Woodcock statement, set to solve case...

[lookout]

Mike said "HIS weapon".

I've completely lost track of this lot as at the mo. I'm emailing a stiff email to Talk-Talk who've been responsible for hacking me. No wonder I've been getting weird emails,etc. They can go and run because I'm changing companies. It's been going on non-stop since February and all they asked me to do was change passwords-----------the damage was already done  What a rubbish company.

[Caroline]

I've completely lost track of this lot as at the mo. I'm emailing a stiff email to Talk-Talk who've been responsible for hacking me. No wonder I've been getting weird emails,etc. They can go and run because I'm changing companies. It's been going on non-stop since February and all they asked me to do was change passwords-----------the damage was already done  What a rubbish company.

You and me both!!  . I just heard about the Talk, Talk hacking - my dad was with them when he died and they tried to suggest that because he had signed a contract with them for a year, that 'I' would have to honour it  . When I stopped laughing, you can imagine what I told them!! Needless to say, they admitted the error of their ways. If you have an online account 'CHANGE YOU PASSWORD NOW!' then get yourself another provider - personally, I don't think you can beat BT. 

[mike tesko]

Just to be clear, I didn't ask him about the daughter, this is a new claim and I don't communicate with Jeremy now, but it begs the question why anyone would believe such a claim without proof! I asked him about the picture on the bed with one shot to the throat.

Oh, I see, so he wasn't saying it's rubbish that a photograph of Sheila on the bed exists, or that it's rubbish that Sheila's body was on the bed at all? He was referring to Sheila's body being on the bed with a solitary shot to the throat, was he?

Well, that explains it then, because he hasn't yet seen the photograph of Sheila on the bed sporting a solitary wound in her neck. Until he does, he's bound to be skepticle. Particularly since he is promoting the idea that Sheila was not shot at all downstairs, instead, he suggests that when the police went to enter the farmhouse PC Collins looked through a ground floor window and saw Sheila, but she fled uptairs before police could gràb her, she entered the main bedroom and shot herself dead in the neck...

It doesn't fit in with his approach in his next CCRC application to agree that he believes a photograph of Sheila on the bed with one shot exists. His approach relying on has ideas cannot possibly be true claiming Sheila got shot twice whilst present in the main bedroom...

[Caroline]

Oh, I see, so he wasn't saying it's rubbish that a photograph of Sheila on the bed exists, or that it's rubbish that Sheila's body was on the bed at all? He was referring to Sheila's body being on the bed with a solitary shot to the throat, was he?

Well, that explains it then, because he hasn't yet seen the photograph of Sheila on the bed sporting a solitary wound in her neck. Until he does, he's bound to be skepticle. Particularly since he is promoting the idea that Sheila was not shot at all downstairs, instead, he suggests that when the police went to enter the farmhouse PC Collins looked through a ground floor window and saw Sheila, but she fled uptairs before police could gràb her, she entered the main bedroom and shot herself dead in the neck...

It doesn't fit in with his approach in his next CCRC application to agree that he believes a photograph of Sheila on the bed with one shot exists. His approach relying on h8s ideas cannot possibly be true claiming Sheila got shot twice whilst present in the main bedroom...

He doesn't think the police shot Sheila (although I think he did once indicate something similar in the past). What he did say was that such a picture (even if it did exist) would be 'irrelevant' as after obtaining most of the PPI materials, there is enough information to formulate further submissions. I have no idea what this information is and tend to believe it's more of the same - I didn't reply and haven't heard from him since.

[Jane]

...................... Yes, the mother of Jeremys daughter did become a close friend of mine, such friendships have to start somewhere. There's nothing utterly amazing about anything, other than why you think I can't have a close friend who I met through my contact with Jeremy in 2002. You should think before you open your gob...

Aww Mike. You misunderstand me. I'm all FOR friendship. It's a wonderful thing which enriches our lives. Friends tend only to see the good in us and are very forgiving. I'm sure your friend will understand why you posted an area map of where her daughter lives, and said something rather unflattering about her. Thank-you for your advice. I consider, very carefully, what I say before opening my mouth.

[John]

I've heard it all now.  Total bonkers!! 

[mike tesko]

He doesn't think the police shot Sheila (although I think he did once indicate something similar in the past). What he did say was that such a picture (even if it did exist) would be 'irrelevant' as after obtaining most of the PPI materials, there is enough information to formulate further submissions. I have no idea what this information is and tend to believe it's more of the same - I didn't reply and haven't heard from him since.

Well, I think the main concern of Jeremy's is that he likes to feel in control of his own destiny. He doesn't appreciate anyone doing anything to try and help him without that somebody running it past him first. In many ways you can't blame him, but in other ways he sometimes shoots himself in the foot. A typical example of this is represented in the form of his current claim that Sheila fled upstairs from the kitchen and then shot herself when she reached the main bedroom. That approach can't possibly succeed because how does he begin to explain how Sheila was pronounced dead downstairs in the region of the main kitchen at 7.37am, and 7.38am? Oh, I can see it all now, there goes Sheila running off upstairs, on her way to taking her own life, and the police passing radio messages that, "She's dead", describing her death, as " A SUICIDE"...

[David1819]

Well, I think the main concern of Jeremy's is that he likes to feel in control of his own destiny.

How can he possibly feel in control of his destiny when he's been locked in a cell for 30 years?

[scipio_usmc]

I once asked him about it, he said it was rubbish (or words to that effect).

I think that there are some things Jeremy secretly pondered trying but ultimately recognized he had no hope with such claims which Mike has decided to run with and spread against Jeremy's wishes because Jeremy himself felt such lies were not worth pressing.

For instance he might have thought about the idea of pretending he had a child but ultimately decided against it.  We have Mike shooting off his mouth though about it. I got involved in this case because someone said it was so similar to the Amityville murders. I saw few similarities but oddly enough similarities keep popping up. In that case DeFeo made up having a child and the mother did try to press
for a portion of the estate.  This was done more than a decade after his conviction. Naturally such efforts went no where and if Jeremy tried he would have no better success.  The difference is Jeremy recognized it would go nowhere and didn't try pursing such rubbish.

Mike does Jeremy a giant disservice when he spreads things that Jeremy himself refused to pursue.

The same is true of all these moved body claims. The defense looked to see if they could find evidence of such but didn't. Mike and the campaign team are ignoring reality to press things that Jeremy didn't because he had no basis to do so. With the exception of gullible ignorant people this tends to hurt Jeremy as opposed to helping. 

[Jane]

How can he possibly feel in control of his destiny when he's been locked in a cell for 30 years?

David, liking to FEEL in control is about grabbing every tiny bit from wherever and whenever -it COULD be called manipulation- but it's vastly different from BEING in control.

[mike tesko]

Professor Knight was right in stating that Sheila could have been mobile for half an hour after being shot on the first occasion...

[mike tesko]

Professor Knight was right in stating that Sheila could have been mobile for half an hour after being shot on the first occasion...

He is an expert in his own right, so why would he make something up, which was not true.

[mike tesko]

Jeremy's daughter did not want the media attention afforded once her true identity was made known, this played a massive role in the decision not to make a valid claim as a benefactor in her grandmother's (June), and her great grandmothers estate(s). The mother agreed with her daughters wishes, and according to what I was told, Jeremy had to accept the situation...

[mike tesko]

No official explanation has yet been disclosed to account for the disappearance of the female body after 8.10am, from the main kitchen, downstairs, to the main bedroom upstairs - but we are getting closer to forcing EP into submission...

[Jane]

He is an expert in his own right, so why would he make something up, which was not true.

Professor Knight was right in stating that Sheila could have been mobile for half an hour after being shot on the first occasion...

Why would he indeed? He was simply giving his -albeit, professional- opinion. Professional opinions differ. Opinions aren't always correct but, as we know, it doesn't make the person GIVING it a liar.