New radio interviews

[Caroline]

and contary to populer opion the organisian he founded does exept anybodys cliams of innocene.

I suspect you meant 'doesn't'? I'm sure old friends don't need an invitation!

[Jan]

I know who he is, I am asking if he is Harrison's anonymous source who Jeremy told the story to about making Sheila change and burning her clothing to help her get rid of evidence.

Then why would he say quite clearly he is innocent? the above scenario does not make Jeremy innocent.

[nugnug]

micheal o brien wouldent talk anonymously hes got no reason to.

[Caroline]

IT'S NOT THE SAME PERSON!!!!

[Jane]

micheal o brien wouldent talk anonymously hes got no reason to.

Michael O'Brian was introduced on public radio as being such. The guy was very open in saying that Jeremy was his friend and he believed him innocent. Unless you're happy with believing there are conspiracies everywhere, please give me one good reason why he -MICHAEL O'BRIAN- should write an anonymous letter to Paul Harrison stating that Jeremy is guilty.

[nugnug]

thats what i just said.

[lookout]

I know Essex is a large county,but because this so-called " threat " which was made to PH had an Essex postmark it could have been anyone,as so far as I can gather MOST of Essex hate Jeremy and would also hate anyone else wherever they lived if they dared to be responsible for suggesting a hint of a MOJ or indeed the imminent release of him. So I wouldn't have said it had been a supporter,quite the contrary-----one posing,and opposing such.

I have my own personal thoughts on this by the way. Someone is doing their damndest in keeping Jeremy where he is. There's a lot riding on it.It'll serve them all right in the end.

[Jane]

I know Essex is a large county,but because this so-called " threat " which was made to PH had an Essex postmark it could have been anyone,as so far as I can gather MOST of Essex hate Jeremy and would also hate anyone else wherever they lived if they dared to be responsible for suggesting a hint of a MOJ or indeed the imminent release of him. So I wouldn't have said it had been a supporter,quite the contrary-----one posing,and opposing such.

I have my own personal thoughts on this by the way. Someone is doing their damndest in keeping Jeremy where he is. There's a lot riding on it.It'll serve them all right in the end.

Correction, lookout. MOST of Essex haven't a clue who is Jeremy Bamber and have never heard of the WHF massacre. Like Diana's death, there was a HUGE hoo ha at the time, but once the initial shock goes, memories start to fade.

You can be relied upon to have personal thoughts on just about everything 

[lookout]

Correction, lookout. MOST of Essex haven't a clue who is Jeremy Bamber and have never heard of the WHF massacre. Like Diana's death, there was a HUGE hoo ha at the time, but once the initial shock goes, memories start to fade.

You can be relied upon to have personal thoughts on just about everything 

I don't think you can make comparisons over Jeremy and Princess Diana,as her name will live forever in the minds of people,not only here but the world over.

[Jane]

I don't think you can make comparisons over Jeremy and Princess Diana,as her name will live forever in the minds of people,not only here but the world over.

Well, if Jeremy's name has all but disappeared from the memories of most of those in his own county, it says little for his chances of being remembered more widely.

[scipio_usmc]

Then why would he say quite clearly he is innocent? the above scenario does not make Jeremy innocent.

The prisoner who told the story to Harrison viewed Jeremy as innocent of the murders.  Such person saw Jeremy as killing her at request and her killing everyone else.

O'Brien didn't indicate what makes him think Jeremy is innocent in the interview.  He was vague about claims of ballistic issues and "other" things.  O'Brien seems to be unaware that the ballistic avenues Jeremy was pursuing were already rejected by the CCRC and thinking that Jeremy didn't submit all of them in his latest submission but rather saved some of the strongest for a future submission is odd to say the least.

My own sense is that O'Brien didn't scrutinize the evidence and claims and is simply being snowed.

[scipio_usmc]

No - The guy in PH'd book i anonymous and thinks Bamber is guilty. Michael O'Brien is also someone who was in prison with Bamber and they were friends - hence he believes Jeremy's side of things.

Oh I was under the misapprehension that the prisoner believed the story but that PH did not and viewed the letter as proof he was in fact involved in the murder only he lied to minimize his role.

[Caroline]

The prisoner who told the story to Harrison viewed Jeremy as innocent of the murders.  Such person saw Jeremy as killing her at request and her killing everyone else.

O'Brien didn't indicate what makes him think Jeremy is innocent in the interview.  He was vague about claims of ballistic issues and "other" things.  O'Brien seems to be unaware that the ballistic avenues Jeremy was pursuing were already rejected by the CCRC and thinking that Jeremy didn't submit all of them in his latest submission but rather saved some of the strongest for a future submission is odd to say the least.

My own sense is that O'Brien didn't scrutinize the evidence and claims and is simply being snowed.

No, that's not how it reads at all - the letter suggests that Jeremy orchestrated the killings and defo put him in the frame for killing the twins!!

[Jan]

The prisoner who told the story to Harrison viewed Jeremy as innocent of the murders.  Such person saw Jeremy as killing her at request and her killing everyone else.

O'Brien didn't indicate what makes him think Jeremy is innocent in the interview.  He was vague about claims of ballistic issues and "other" things.  O'Brien seems to be unaware that the ballistic avenues Jeremy was pursuing were already rejected by the CCRC and thinking that Jeremy didn't submit all of them in his latest submission but rather saved some of the strongest for a future submission is odd to say the least.

My own sense is that O'Brien didn't scrutinize the evidence and claims and is simply being snowed.

Oh my mistake I thought he was there and took Sheilas clothes home to clean them and obviously hide them before the police got there - and did I get it wrong that Sheila asked him to shoot her or did she commit suicide?

And I thought O brien said he knew what the new evidence was - he wish he could reveal it but now is not the time?

[maggie]

Oh my mistake I thought he was there and took Sheilas clothes home to clean them and obviously hide them before the police got there - and did I get it wrong that Sheila asked him to shoot her or did she commit suicide?

And I thought O brien said he knew what the new evidence was - he wish he could reveal it but now is not the time?

You are right Jan, the exprisoner who wrote the letter said Jeremyvas with Sheila but he just loaded the rifle, shot Sheila when she begged him to and no comment on who shit the twins. He said he took Sheila's bloody clothes and left through the window, slamming it behind him.