The Murders at White House Farm - By Carol Ann Lee (A Taster!)

[scipio_usmc]

If you remember back,PH stated that although he couldnt say either way whether Jeremy was indeed guilty or not,he did feel JB's case was a MOJ. He made that decision AFTER he had seemingly researched the case. He previously believed the silencer evidence to be corrupt,along with the investigation and some of its main players and he had said he could prove it. I understood that exposing the corruption was the purpose of his writing the book.hence the original title being 'Dead bodies don't move'. Even if PH came to the conclusion of JB's guilt,it doesn't alter what he allegedly uncovered with regards to the investigation. Due to the legal implications,I dont believe that anyone will ever be able to write a book revealing the truth behind this case (whether JB guilty or not),certainly not in our lifetime anyway.

If he did claim such then it means his research ended up not proving what he suspected was the case.

[Adam]

Both books are probably just a rewrite of Wilkes's book. With a bit of extra useless information which has been gathered in the last 20 years.

Both books will hopefully deal with Bamber's fight for freedom and appeals. Right up to the present day. But then the whole of the 2002 appeal is already online.

[Adam]

If PH and CAL did find proof of police corruption, or that key experts or witnesses lied, what is the protocol ?

Do they go straight to the authorities and Bamber's lawyers. Then wait for the conclusion of this, before submitting the book ? Or can they just submit the book with the proof in ? And wait for the back lash.

[Adam]

http://www.itv.com/news/calendar/update/2015-07-29/yorkshire-author-writes-book-about-jeremy-bamber-case/

It says Bamber wrote to ITV saying all the evidence pointed to Sheila being guilty 

[jon]

http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/features/features/13520876.Did_Jeremy_Bamber_kill_his_family_30_years_ago__Make_up_your_own_mind__says_local_author_Carol_Ann_Lee__whose_book_about_the_murder

[Adam]

According to CAL's book P399 all documents previously held under PII have now been released to JB. 

[Jan]

According to CAL's book P399 all documents previously held under PII have now been released to JB.

yes that is true. But not that long ago

[Jan]

If PH and CAL did find proof of police corruption, or that key experts or witnesses lied, what is the protocol ?

Do they go straight to the authorities and Bamber's lawyers. Then wait for the conclusion of this, before submitting the book ? Or can they just submit the book with the proof in ? And wait for the back lash.

that is probably a moral question rather than a legal one. I bet they would wait until after publication to ensure sales of the book . Cant give away the ending before publication - oh but PH did.

[Jan]

it should be on my kindle so perhaps will start reading soon.

[Jan]

According to CAL's book P399 all documents previously held under PII have now been released to JB.

I could tell you a secret - but I wont because I don't trust you.

[maggie]

it should be on my kindle so perhaps will start reading soon.

Yes jan I got mine on KINDLE on 30TH

[Adam]

yes that is true. But not that long ago

You kept that quiet.

Are you engaging with Bamber ? Why ?

[Jan]

You kept that quiet.

Are you engaging with Bamber ? Why ?

Not that its any of your business but that information came from another source and I was asked to keep it quiet which I did - and there was a reason for that. TBH I am surprised it is in the book.

[Caroline]

According to CAL's book P399 all documents previously held under PII have now been released to JB.

I posted that MONTHS ago!

[Caroline]

Not that its any of your business but that information came from another source and I was asked to keep it quiet which I did - and there was a reason for that. TBH I am surprised it is in the book.

I posted it here ages ago - I was told just after Christmas wasn't told to keep it quiet.