Who gained the most

[clifford]

Who at the end of the day went away happy

[Kaldin]

Who at the end of the day went away happy

Gained the most from what? The deaths or the conviction of Jeremy?

[nugnug]

well bamber would of gained if he hadent been sent down for murder.

the cousin who found the silencer gained i believe

[Kaldin]

well bamber would of gained if he hadent been sent down for murder.

the cousin who found the silencer gained i believe

Yes. Jeremy would have gained if he had not been convicted.

Several of the relatives gained from Jeremy's conviction, but the question is - did they know they would gain from that? It seems that Robert Boutflour was pretty sure they would, but at what point did he know that? Before or after the silencer evidence was found or after?

[clifford]

Who at the end of the day went away happy

Gained the most from what? The deaths or the conviction of Jeremy?
[/qu
ote
both

[John]

well bamber would of gained if he hadent been sent down for murder.

the cousin who found the silencer gained i believe

Yes. Jeremy would have gained if he had not been convicted.

Several of the relatives gained from Jeremy's conviction, but the question is - did they know they would gain from that? It seems that Robert Boutflour was pretty sure they would, but at what point did he know that? Before or after the silencer evidence was found or after?

Why do you insist on accusing Robert Boutflour of benefiting on the back of Jeremy's conviction when he ultimately brought it upon himself?

[Kaldin]

well bamber would of gained if he hadent been sent down for murder.

the cousin who found the silencer gained i believe

Yes. Jeremy would have gained if he had not been convicted.

Several of the relatives gained from Jeremy's conviction, but the question is - did they know they would gain from that? It seems that Robert Boutflour was pretty sure they would, but at what point did he know that? Before or after the silencer evidence was found or after?

Why do you insist on accusing Robert Boutflour of benefiting on the back of Jeremy's conviction when he ultimately brought it upon himself?

The question was - who gained the most. The relatives benefitted from the conviction of Jeremy Bamber. Do you disagree with that?

[sandy]

well bamber would of gained if he hadent been sent down for murder.

the cousin who found the silencer gained i believe

Yes. Jeremy would have gained if he had not been convicted.

Several of the relatives gained from Jeremy's conviction, but the question is - did they know they would gain from that? It seems that Robert Boutflour was pretty sure they would, but at what point did he know that? Before or after the silencer evidence was found or after?

Why do you insist on accusing Robert Boutflour of benefiting on the back of Jeremy's conviction when he ultimately brought it upon himself?

Why shouldn't the relatives have benefited from the conviction, it is testamentary law after all.

Jackie was making the very same comments earlier today and insinuating that the relatives were in some way not entitled to the property they ultimately inherited.

I think you should be looking to Jeremy Bamber for the reasons why Robert Boutflour and others came off best.

[clifford]

Sandy, my point is that the Boutflours were in a win win situation..
I am NOT suggesting that they fabricated anything, but they did come out of it smelling of roses.

[sandy]

Sandy, my point is that the Boutflours were in a win win situation..
I am NOT suggesting that they fabricated anything, but they did come out of it smelling of roses.

Sorry Cliff, I may have misunderstood your comment. The Eaton's and the Boutflour's were in a win win situation as you put it but through no fault of their own.  Others have suggested that their evidence was tainted since they stood to gain substantially.  I think the authorities would have been well aware of that when taking their evidence into consideration.

[John]

I think the Boutflours could do right for doing wrong in some people's eyes.  What were they supposed to do, give the farm to the State?

[clifford]

I think the Boutflours could do right for doing wrong in some people's eyes.  What were they supposed to do, give the farm to the State?

Heaven forbid that. I am only saying that they had an awful lot to lose if JB decided to sell up.

[John]

I don't understand what you mean by sell up Cliff.  Jeremy was never in a position to sell anything as far as I understand.

[clifford]

I don't understand what you mean by sell up Cliff.  Jeremy was never in a position to sell anything as far as I understand.

What I was implying that if JB had got the inheritence he may have sold up, which would have left the Boutflours out on a limb.I wont go further than that as I think it has been done to death. Respectfully no pun intended.

[Jackiepreece]

Sandy as you seem to wealth of knowledge about the family and wills etc would you say at the same time as the murders the family were having financial problems

Would you agree the argument between Neville and Peter was over a land deal wasn't it

Would you also agree it was a huge coincidence that the silencer was found in a cupboard already searched by the police by the family at the same time they had financial problems