Author Topic: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.  (Read 10949 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #180 on: June 16, 2015, 11:02:AM »
you seem determined to deflect to shut down all disccusen about this subject i must be getting somwhere.

Ha, ha!! Your the one deflecting, deflecting from the FACT that Jeremy tried to sell explicit pictures of his dead sister. I have asked you what else you think was said in the phone call and what you think was suspicious about it? You didn't answer. If you can't answer your own question, how do you expect anyone else to? I can't quite believe that you think this is more important that Bamber trying to sell the pictures but if you KNOW something about the call that we don't, I'm sure we'd all be interested?
« Last Edit: June 16, 2015, 11:03:AM by Caroline »
Few people have the imagination for reality

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #181 on: June 16, 2015, 11:27:AM »
as i said i dont think he did phone him by mistake i think he ethere wanted to ask or tell colin somthing.

colin thought the phonecall was a bit suspicios himself.

and i think the fact he had said he phoned him by mistake is a bit suspicios.
« Last Edit: June 16, 2015, 11:29:AM by nugnug »

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #182 on: June 16, 2015, 11:36:AM »
as i said i dont think he did phone him by mistake i think he ethere wanted to ask or tell colin somthing.

colin thought the phonecall was a bit suspicios himself.

and i think the fact he had said he phoned him by mistake is a bit suspicios.
He did want to tell him something - he wanted to tell him that Bamber would be in the paper the following day having been arrested. And?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44294
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #183 on: June 16, 2015, 12:16:PM »
I did ask this question to Nugnug on the first page. He didn't answer. Several pages in he said the issue was important but did not expand.

A family had been massacred. CC and DB were close to the deceased. They spoke on the phone,  once.

Seems like the conspiracy is widening.
« Last Edit: June 16, 2015, 12:22:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #184 on: June 16, 2015, 12:22:PM »
He did want to tell him something - he wanted to tell him that Bamber would be in the paper the following day having been arrested. And?

but colin would read it anyway and he could of just told jeremy had been arrested

and im also wondering why he felt the need to say he had phoned him by mistake .

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44294
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #185 on: June 16, 2015, 12:26:PM »
but colin would read it anyway and he could of just told jeremy had been arrested

and im also wondering why he felt the need to say he had phoned him by mistake .

Did CC read The Sun ? He seems more of a Daily Telegraph person to me.

Why don't you tell us why he had this urgent need to say he phoned him by mistake.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #186 on: June 16, 2015, 12:37:PM »
but colin would read it anyway and he could of just told jeremy had been arrested

and im also wondering why he felt the need to say he had phoned him by mistake .

You are trying to make something out of nothing in order to deflect from the issue at hand which is Jeremy trying to sell nude pictures of his sister. Boutflour notifying Colin that he should watch the news because Jeremy is going to be arrested soon is no suspicious and has no ability to be used to establish any wrongdoing.  You spend all your time trying to cast unspecified worthless suspicion on the family to try to say that none of the evidence against Jeremy is trustworthy because the family is suspicious and the police are as well.  That just amounts to worthless apologist efforts.  It fails to provide any rational basis to doubt any of the evidence it is simply used as a worthless excuse to pretend you have a valid reason for ignoring the evidence when you don't.

The whole reason Mike and the campaign team and most other Jeremy supporters resort to smokescreens is because you have nothing legitimate to raise. That is why all Jeremy's appeals have gone no where- the defense was unable to raise anything valid.
 
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #187 on: June 16, 2015, 12:37:PM »
well it was obviosly he knew colin was suspicious about why he had been phoned.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #188 on: June 16, 2015, 12:52:PM »
well it was obviosly he knew colin was suspicious about why he had been phoned.

You still have no point.  It makes no difference what motivated him to tell Colin to keep his eyes open because Jeremy was going to be int he news for his arrest.  It makes no difference if he was motivated by glee or out of feeling Colin should know since it affects him or some other reaosn.  You always make pointless arguments instead of something sensible.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #189 on: June 16, 2015, 01:16:PM »
you really have a problem with this thread im glad i started it.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #190 on: June 16, 2015, 01:40:PM »
but colin would read it anyway and he could of just told jeremy had been arrested

and im also wondering why he felt the need to say he had phoned him by mistake .

Well, at least you're pondering the main aspects of the case  ;D ;D ;D ::)

Why don't you ask him?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #191 on: June 16, 2015, 02:18:PM »
you really have a problem with this thread im glad i started it.

No I have a problem with you making no sense ever and not having any point but simply trying to deflect from the issues in this cases with utter nonsense.  While you claim I post nothing but bullshit the truth is that is all you post.
« Last Edit: June 16, 2015, 02:20:PM by scipio_usmc »
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #192 on: June 16, 2015, 04:29:PM »
Well, at least you're pondering the main aspects of the case  ;D ;D ;D ::)

Why don't you ask him?

where can i do that do you think he will rember do you think he will answer.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #193 on: June 16, 2015, 04:32:PM »
where can i do that do you think he will rember do you think he will answer.

I have no idea but no, I don't think he would remember - it was just a 'heads-up' call.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: david boutflowers phonecall to colin.
« Reply #194 on: June 16, 2015, 04:39:PM »
I have no idea but no, I don't think he would remember - it was just a 'heads-up' call.
I think they're wading birds while storks are bakers. ;)