Author Topic: Michael Fielder Proven liar  (Read 95351 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Michael Fielder Proven liar
« Reply #765 on: October 04, 2017, 07:28:PM »




It's quite obvious RWB never saw them or we wouldn't have heard the last of them.

If it's never been suggested that he had, it's irrelevant, isn't it?

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17250
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Michael Fielder Proven liar
« Reply #766 on: October 04, 2017, 07:28:PM »
Jeremy has them squirreled away to flog when he gets out of prison?

so where would he of put them.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Michael Fielder Proven liar
« Reply #767 on: October 04, 2017, 07:28:PM »
so where are they now then.

why has nobody seen them.

Like who?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44292
Re: Michael Fielder Proven liar
« Reply #768 on: October 04, 2017, 07:40:PM »
Nugs isn't still going on about his conspiracy theory which was dismissed weeks ago.

How would anyone know where photos which are over 30 years old are.

Why weren't they printed by The Sun ? They were too raunchy for a national tabloid.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17250
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Michael Fielder Proven liar
« Reply #769 on: October 04, 2017, 07:46:PM »
Nugs isn't still going on about his conspiracy theory which was dismissed weeks ago.

How would anyone know where photos which are over 30 years old are.

Why weren't they printed by The Sun ? They were too raunchy for a national tabloid.

well somobebody would have to know if they exited or ever did.

why were they never found at the time.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Michael Fielder Proven liar
« Reply #770 on: October 04, 2017, 07:52:PM »
so where would he of put them.

Don't ask me. Write to him and ask.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17250
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Michael Fielder Proven liar
« Reply #771 on: October 04, 2017, 07:58:PM »
Don't ask me. Write to him and ask.

well if did would hardly be likely to tell me would he.

so as you came up with the suggestion i have to ask you.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Michael Fielder Proven liar
« Reply #772 on: October 04, 2017, 08:01:PM »
If it's never been suggested that he had, it's irrelevant, isn't it?





Why ? He'd picked up on just about everything else that was irrelevant.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17250
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Michael Fielder Proven liar
« Reply #773 on: October 04, 2017, 08:06:PM »




Why ? He'd picked up on just about everything else that was irrelevant.

yes that's true there not mentioned in his famous dairy.

it seems to be the one bit of gossip he never picked up on.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Michael Fielder Proven liar
« Reply #774 on: October 04, 2017, 08:24:PM »




Why ? He'd picked up on just about everything else that was irrelevant.

He painted a picture of a character as he saw it. He's not alone in being judgemental.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Michael Fielder Proven liar
« Reply #775 on: October 04, 2017, 08:39:PM »
He painted a picture of a character as he saw it. He's not alone in being judgemental.





Painting a picture and openly accusing are two different things.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Michael Fielder Proven liar
« Reply #776 on: October 04, 2017, 08:43:PM »
yes that's true there not mentioned in his famous dairy.

it seems to be the one bit of gossip he never picked up on.

Possibly because it was nothing to do with the murders. But they were reported in the paper or is all that made up to?  ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Michael Fielder Proven liar
« Reply #777 on: October 04, 2017, 08:45:PM »




Painting a picture and openly accusing are two different things.

Hold that thought, Lookout.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17250
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Michael Fielder Proven liar
« Reply #778 on: October 04, 2017, 08:49:PM »
Possibly because it was nothing to do with the murders. But they were reported in the paper or is all that made up to?  ;D

a lot of things were nothing to do with the murders but he seemed  to make it his business to know about them.

the eatons seemed to know the familys affairs better than the family did but they dident know anything about this.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Michael Fielder Proven liar
« Reply #779 on: October 04, 2017, 08:53:PM »
a lot of things were nothing to do with the murders but he seemed  to make it his business to know about them.

the eatons seemed to know the familys affairs better than the family did but they dident know anything about this.

Of course they did - it was in the newspaper!  ::)
Few people have the imagination for reality