maybe it was a mistake to read to much into it but that does not make the capaghn team dishonest or liars.
Mixing logs makes one a liar. Failing to mention the other logs makes one dishonest. Misrepresenting that a log states 3 further bodies were found upstairs when it doesn't mention such is dishonest. Asserting a log states that people were found in the kitchen when it merely states police entered and so far found 2 bodies asserts 2 bodies were found in the kitchen is dishonest.
There is great twisting going on. There was a single log that contained the error of 2 bodies found in the kitchen. AT MOST this log could be used for investigative purposes to try to find out who wrote it and to ask if they recall with precision the words of those who provided the information and who provided the information they recorded on the log. Then the person who said it could be questioned about what they actually said. If they respond that they were listening in to CA/7 like other people were then we already know what CA/7 said because there was a memo page devoted exclusively to that message and it didn't state 2 bodies found in the kitchen which means the person who wrote such made a mistake. To knowingly use a mistake to try to establish something is dishonest.
The defense didn't go into such inquiry because they knew it would lead no where. You follow the trail when you are unsure where the trail will ultimately lead. We know where the trail leads- we know which officers are the eyewitnesses who entered the kitchen. That is who you speak to the eyewitnesses not the grapevine. Only a few members of the raid team entered the master bedroom and saw Sheila. A larger number of those in charge and support personnel ended up seeing her body. A majority of the raid team entered the kitchen though and saw only 1 body. These are the only accounts that matter with respect to establish where the bodies were. What the grapevine said is not of any consequence.
The campaign team knows that Sheila's body was not in the kitchen. No eyewitnesses claim it had been there, no blood evidence or other physical evidence establishes she had been in the kitchen at all let alone her body in there and no photos or the like establish her body had been there. Blood evidence, eyewitness testimony and photos do establish her body was in the master bedroom.
The campaign team has no evidentiary basis to assert her body had been in the kitchen and has no logical reason why police would move her body anyway. The campaign team intentionally distorts the significance of a log that claimed two bodies were found in the kitchen and intentionally distorted what various other logs state in a dishonest attempt to pretend there is reason to believe Sheila's body had originally been in the kitchen even though female body could have meant June as easily as Sheila and clearly the second body found was in fact June. Furthermore they thought it was June in the kitchen before entry because Collins though Nevill was an old woman from behind he saw wild gray hair that he thought belonged to a female.
This is just one of many distortions on he site and when all the distortions are stripped away the campaign site has nothing left. They raise nothing legitimate just nonsense claims of bodies moved, the dishonest claim that someone inside the house was talking to police dishonest claim that Nevill phoned police... If Jeremy were actually innocent they would not need to resort to lies and would have something legitimate to raise.
