Michael Fielder Proven liar

[Adam]

its ment to you xxxxx i just wanted the real source for some of the cliams made in her book.

But Nugs all of you're conspiracy theories just makes you look like an xxxx & makes Bamber look more guilty.

[Adam]

Ah ok - so only days before Bamber was talking to Colin about pictures in which "You can see everything right down to the last detail" - Bamber meets journo Michael Fielder who prints a story about him trying to sell explicit pictures claims he said "You can see everything right down to the last detail"? From that you deduce Fielder just guessed? 

You know what's coming from Nugs.

Fielder spoke to CC within the few hours between meeting Bamber & publishing the story.

[nugnug]

You know what's coming from Nugs. Fielder spoke to CC within the few hours between meeting Bamber & publishing the story.

sugesting that a proven liar might be lying is comspriacy theory is it maybe you should look up what the words mean as you clearly dont understand what a conspriacy theory is.

[Caroline]

You know what's coming from Nugs.

Fielder spoke to CC within the few hours between meeting Bamber & publishing the story.

Yes, I did think of that too, problem with that is, he'd have to call Colin a liar to argue that. I don't know why they don't just give it up. It's obvious he tried to sell the pictures. It's collateral damage - don't make him a killer, just someone very little moral fiber. 

[Caroline]

sugesting that a proven liar might be lying is comspriacy theory is it maybe you should look up what the words mean as you clearly dont understand what a conspriacy theory is.

There is 'usually' some substance to it - not in this case! Fielder might have lied or exaggerated - not in this case, he didn't need to.

[gringo]

You completely overlook that Jeremy Bamber used exactly the same description of the photographs to Michael Fielder as he did to Colin Caffell, namely that "they show everything down to the last detail."

   I don't ignore this at all and have shown in detail exactly how Fielder could have known already that JB had described the photos to Colin in this way.
    In a nutshell, the relatives were talking to Colin giving Colin the impression that they were trying to frame him. They were also interfering in the police investigation. It has been shown previously that a number of people were aware of the existence of the photos. Given the conversations that the family had with Colin and their obvious attempts to frame JB, I would be surprised if they hadn't found out about the pics themselves through Colin.
   If your case that JB tried to sell the pics relies on Fielder's use of nine words in his 300/500 word article then it is a weak argument, Steve.

[Adam]

sugesting that a proven liar might be lying is comspriacy theory is it maybe you should look up what the words mean as you clearly dont understand what a conspriacy theory is.

Bamber is a proven multiple liar. He's spent 32 years in jail for it.

Fielder had no reason to lie. The Campaign for Freedom says Bamber was offerring 'his account' for free. A big, free exclusive.

Or do you disagree with 'The campaign for freedom' ?

[maggie]

It's also about time this thread was either locked or merged with the others on Brett Collins and The Sun.

Steve I have been too busy this week to do anything much on the forum.  I doubt I will have time to do anything with it til next week. You will just have to cope til then.

[nugnug]

   I don't ignore this at all and have shown in detail exactly how Fielder could have known already that JB had described the photos to Colin in this way.
    In a nutshell, the relatives were talking to Colin giving Colin the impression that they were trying to frame him. They were also interfering in the police investigation. It has been shown previously that a number of people were aware of the existence of the photos. Given the conversations that the family had with Colin and their obvious attempts to frame JB, I would be surprised if they hadn't found out about the pics themselves through Colin.
   If your case that JB tried to sell the pics relies on Fielder's use of nine words in his 300/500 word article then it is a weak argument, Steve.

and im sure the police knew as well.

[nugnug]

Bamber is a proven multiple liar. He's spent 32 years in jail for it.

Fielder had no reason to lie. The Campaign for Freedom says Bamber was offerring 'his account' for free. A big, free exclusive.

Or do you disagree with 'The campaign for freedom' ?

so what reason did he have to lie in the tart of gibralter case then we know he did lie.

[Steve_uk]

   I don't ignore this at all and have shown in detail exactly how Fielder could have known already that JB had described the photos to Colin in this way.
    In a nutshell, the relatives were talking to Colin giving Colin the impression that they were trying to frame him. They were also interfering in the police investigation. It has been shown previously that a number of people were aware of the existence of the photos. Given the conversations that the family had with Colin and their obvious attempts to frame JB, I would be surprised if they hadn't found out about the pics themselves through Colin.
   If your case that JB tried to sell the pics relies on Fielder's use of nine words in his 300/500 word article then it is a weak argument, Steve.

No it's conclusive; just you won't admit it.

[Caroline]

   I don't ignore this at all and have shown in detail exactly how Fielder could have known already that JB had described the photos to Colin in this way.
    In a nutshell, the relatives were talking to Colin giving Colin the impression that they were trying to frame him. They were also interfering in the police investigation. It has been shown previously that a number of people were aware of the existence of the photos. Given the conversations that the family had with Colin and their obvious attempts to frame JB, I would be surprised if they hadn't found out about the pics themselves through Colin.
   If your case that JB tried to sell the pics relies on Fielder's use of nine words in his 300/500 word article then it is a weak argument, Steve.

The likelihood of Fielder coming up with the exact same 9 words is almost nil - that's not a weak argument. You argument hinges on a faint possibility that the relatives found out about the photographs. That's not just weak, it's pathetic!

He tried to sell the pictures, it's obvious 

[Caroline]

so what reason did he have to lie in the tart of gibralter case then we know he did lie.

Don't know and don't care because that has nothing to do with Bamber trying to sell dodgy pictures of his dead sister.

[Adam]

so what reason did he have to lie in the tart of gibralter case then we know he did lie.

Gibraltar. That's a curve ball.

At least me saying Bamber is a multiple liar is to do with the case.

So you disagree with 'The Campaign for freedom'.

Nugs, you're again on you're own.

[maggie]

Nugs created a thread on whether Claire Powell used Brett Collins as a source.

Not sure how that shows Bamber is innocent.

Well Adam you are a fine one to talk.... how many threads have you created which proved absolutely nothing.