Author Topic: Familiar Portrait?  (Read 19155 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #105 on: May 20, 2015, 10:59:AM »




There are plenty of young men today who act like " old men ".Takes them all their time to put one foot in front of the other.What about the " workshy " ones ? That's been going on for years,as well as those who don't get up until gone lunchtime. If Jeremy could have got away with it,he too could have joined that army of slobs.

But he wasn't workshy, you said yourself above he'd worked a 16/17 hour day.





I don't think so. Jeremy would have been the type that anything under a£million wouldn't have been worth it.

So he would have killed them for a million?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #106 on: May 20, 2015, 11:00:AM »
Figure of speech to suit you.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #107 on: May 20, 2015, 11:02:AM »
But he wasn't workshy, you said yourself above he'd worked a 16/17 hour day.
Because he'd had a good talking to by both parents.
So he would have killed them for a million?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #108 on: May 20, 2015, 11:02:AM »




There are plenty of young men today who act like " old men ".Takes them all their time to put one foot in front of the other.What about the " workshy " ones ? That's been going on for years,as well as those who don't get up until gone lunchtime. If Jeremy could have got away with it,he too could have joined that army of slobs.


You are not describing Jeremy here, Lookout. You can't have it both ways. There was none of the "old m an" about Jeremy. He was a party animal whose life revolved around night life. Typical of his generation and type.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #109 on: May 20, 2015, 11:04:AM »

You are not describing Jeremy here, Lookout. You can't have it both ways. There was none of the "old m an" about Jeremy. He was a party animal whose life revolved around night life. Typical of his generation and type.





Partying was different to working,as it is to the MAJORITY of youngsters.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #110 on: May 20, 2015, 11:05:AM »
Give me one youngster who hurtles to work the same as they do a night out.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #111 on: May 20, 2015, 11:07:AM »
Jeremy was NO different to generations of people his age.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #112 on: May 20, 2015, 12:19:PM »
Give me one youngster who hurtles to work the same as they do a night out.

There are loads of them!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #113 on: May 20, 2015, 12:20:PM »
Jeremy was NO different to generations of people his age.

Oh, there is one BIG difference, most don't kill their family for inheritance!!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #114 on: May 20, 2015, 12:32:PM »
Oh, there is one BIG difference, most don't kill their family for inheritance!!






No,they don't,Jeremy included.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #115 on: May 20, 2015, 12:33:PM »
It wasn't an inheritance murder.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #116 on: May 20, 2015, 12:44:PM »
Do we know how much cannabis was in the safe ? Nope.
Do we know why,in God's name it was there anyway ? Nope.
Do we know who knew it was there ? Nope.
Do we know where it ended up ? Nope.
Do we know if it was included in the list of items from the farmhouse ? Nope.
Do we know if EP questioned its existence ? Nope.
Do we know if Sheila had demanded any cannabis and had been refused ? Nope.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #117 on: May 20, 2015, 12:49:PM »
Without her " fix ",Sheila wouldn't have been able to sleep,she'd have been restless and irritable,with mood-swings.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #118 on: May 20, 2015, 12:50:PM »
It wasn't an inheritance murder.

Well, that's you personal opinion which you're entitled to, however, the court and majority think differently and that won't change.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Familiar Portrait?
« Reply #119 on: May 20, 2015, 12:52:PM »
More than enough has been said about Jeremy and his drugs,even JM for that matter,but NOTHING has ever been said about it being in the safe at the farmhouse,or who it belonged to. Strange,that.