0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Please do.
If he is a psychopath, he wouldn´t have a problem with lying to you and answer your question with a NO!
Considering the appauling track records of Rupert Murdoch's Newspaper companies there could have been no basis in truth at all.
Example of the kind of drivel The Sun published in 1985.http://i.imgur.com/STJZC4q.jpg
What would make a better story? Soft porn pictures of a dead model that they wouldn't really be able to print anyway? Or a story about the only surviving bother who tried to sell said pictures only a short while after her death? If Jeremy didn't approach the reporter, how did he know that there were soft porn pictures of her? The fact that such pictures existed is confirmed by Colin. Sun reporters are a lot of things but they aren't psychic.
The photographer who took the alleged pictures of Sheila and the reporter from the sun were both part of the media, they probably knew each other.Photographer to reporter: "You know what, I took these x-rated pictures of blah blah blah"Could easily have happened that way, no need to be psychic!
Now that's denial! The photographer would have got what from it? They didn't use the pictures, they wrote a story about Jeremy Bamber trying to sell his dead sisters pictures.
Yes,the Sun newspaper was right when in 1985 it had reported that a police officer had found both June and Sheila on the bed with a rifle between them.The Sun is always right.Best tabloid amongst them which always tells the truth. Was it Adams who'd reported the " find " ? Good old Adams.
Just thought I´d highlight that. The tone, the rudeness, constantly.No, it´s a suggestion, doesn´t neccessarily mean I 100% believe it happened that way, but it can be argued, so I did.
it doesnt take psycic powers to work out that a good looking model may have done a topless shoot at some time.