Author Topic: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:  (Read 80805 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #60 on: May 06, 2015, 09:40:PM »
Please do.
No. Have been working all day and part of the evening, you look! Why don´t you trust me?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #61 on: May 06, 2015, 11:21:PM »
If he is a psychopath, he wouldn´t have a problem with lying to you and answer your question with a NO!  ;) ;)

Far better to 'tell the truth where possible' (his words) ;)
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #62 on: May 06, 2015, 11:26:PM »
Considering the appauling track records of Rupert Murdoch's Newspaper companies there could have been no basis in truth at all.  8)

What would make a better story? Soft porn pictures of a dead model that they wouldn't really be able to print anyway? Or a story about the only surviving bother who tried to sell said pictures only a short while after her death? If Jeremy didn't approach the reporter, how did he know that there were soft porn pictures of her? The fact that such pictures existed is confirmed by Colin. Sun reporters are a lot of things but they aren't psychic.  8)
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline gringo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #63 on: May 06, 2015, 11:32:PM »
Example of the kind of drivel The Sun published in 1985.

http://i.imgur.com/STJZC4q.jpg
  Not forgetting that it was the Sun's sister paper that paid Mugford for her not entirely truthful account. Everything printed in any Murdoch rag should automatically be treated with scepticism.
   

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17250
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #64 on: May 06, 2015, 11:51:PM »
i think it is by most people.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #65 on: May 07, 2015, 12:01:AM »
What would make a better story? Soft porn pictures of a dead model that they wouldn't really be able to print anyway? Or a story about the only surviving bother who tried to sell said pictures only a short while after her death? If Jeremy didn't approach the reporter, how did he know that there were soft porn pictures of her? The fact that such pictures existed is confirmed by Colin. Sun reporters are a lot of things but they aren't psychic.  8)

The photographer who took the alleged pictures of Sheila and the reporter from the sun were both part of the media, they probably knew each other.
Photographer to reporter: "You know what, I took these x-rated pictures of blah blah blah"
Could easily have happened that way, no need to be psychic!

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13780
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #66 on: May 07, 2015, 02:00:AM »
The photographer who took the alleged pictures of Sheila and the reporter from the sun were both part of the media, they probably knew each other.
Photographer to reporter: "You know what, I took these x-rated pictures of blah blah blah"
Could easily have happened that way, no need to be psychic!

Why would Rupert Murdoch be producing pornography?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #67 on: May 07, 2015, 04:03:AM »
The photographer who took the alleged pictures of Sheila and the reporter from the sun were both part of the media, they probably knew each other.
Photographer to reporter: "You know what, I took these x-rated pictures of blah blah blah"
Could easily have happened that way, no need to be psychic!

Now that's denial! The photographer would have got what from it? They didn't use the pictures, they wrote a story about Jeremy Bamber trying to sell his dead sisters pictures.
« Last Edit: May 07, 2015, 04:06:AM by Caroline »
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #68 on: May 07, 2015, 09:40:AM »
Now that's denial! The photographer would have got what from it? They didn't use the pictures, they wrote a story about Jeremy Bamber trying to sell his dead sisters pictures.

Just thought I´d highlight that. The tone, the rudeness, constantly.
No, it´s a suggestion, doesn´t neccessarily mean I 100% believe it happened that way, but it can be argued, so I did.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #69 on: May 07, 2015, 09:48:AM »
 Colin took some risqué pics,I believe,as did a friend of Sheila,in the garden of the ( female ) friend.

I don't find this any worse than the " horseplay " performed by the very ones who were supposed to be investigating the case.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17250
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #70 on: May 07, 2015, 10:36:AM »
What would make a better story? Soft porn pictures of a dead model that they wouldn't really be able to print anyway? Or a story about the only surviving bother who tried to sell said pictures only a short while after her death? If Jeremy didn't approach the reporter, how did he know that there were soft porn pictures of her? The fact that such pictures existed is confirmed by Colin. Sun reporters are a lot of things but they aren't psychic.  8)

it doesnt take psycic powers to work out that a good looking model may have done a topless shoot at some time.
« Last Edit: May 07, 2015, 10:47:AM by nugnug »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #71 on: May 07, 2015, 10:45:AM »
Yes,the Sun newspaper was right when in 1985 it had reported that a police officer had found both June and Sheila on the bed with a rifle between them.
The Sun is always right.Best tabloid amongst them which always tells the truth. Was it Adams who'd reported the " find " ? Good old Adams.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #72 on: May 07, 2015, 11:19:AM »
Yes,the Sun newspaper was right when in 1985 it had reported that a police officer had found both June and Sheila on the bed with a rifle between them.
The Sun is always right.Best tabloid amongst them which always tells the truth. Was it Adams who'd reported the " find " ? Good old Adams.

They were told that.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #73 on: May 07, 2015, 11:21:AM »
Just thought I´d highlight that. The tone, the rudeness, constantly.
No, it´s a suggestion, doesn´t neccessarily mean I 100% believe it happened that way, but it can be argued, so I did.

The tone and the rudeness ges both ways and you yourself are far from innocent.

Not sure why you would post something you had no faith in.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #74 on: May 07, 2015, 11:25:AM »
it doesnt take psycic powers to work out that a good looking model may have done a topless shoot at some time.

What would be the point of making the story up about Jeremy? Or are posters now suggesting that even the newspaper was involved in the 'conspiracy' to frame Bamber? The seed for the tory had to come from somewhere - I think it simply came from Jeremy, anything else, just doesn't make sense.
Few people have the imagination for reality