Bamber's footprints and fingerprints will be all over the house. He was a regular visitor. Either sneaking through windows to look at wills, or popping over for supper and a rabbit massacre. So no possible joy for the police here.
Bamber had a month to dispose of clothes. Even so John Hayward found human blood on Bamber's jacket, bathrobe and in his car.
The crime was committed by Sheila or Bamber. There is a mountain of forensic evidence showing it was not Sheila. Which automatically shows it was Bamber.
June being shot with her head on the pillow is forensic evidence pointing to Bamber rather than Sheila.
There is the silencer evidence which shows beyond doubt it was Bamber.
There is the found hack saw which Bamber admitted using to get in and out of WHF. But apparently not on the massacre night.
There is the discovery that the kitchen window could be banged shut from outside.
No one can explain how Sheila could have committed the massacre to match the crime scene.
this is what makes me really cross about you .You repeat things which you know are not proven as fact.
He did not have a month to dispose of the evidence. The family were watching like a hawk and the police were round his house immediately. Mentioning the blood on his clothes is pathetic - if you are old enough to shave I am willing to bet I would find blood on your clothes.
The court said it did not have to be proven the window could lock from the outside -therefore it was not proven. And even if it was it only shows opportunity not a forensic fact.
supposed evidence that Sheila did not do it is not forensic evidence that Jeremy did it.
Lets go back to the mountain of forensic evidence that Jeremy did it . It has been used against killers who have killed in their own homes before - so start again please.
