New video:

[Patti]

Or one part of a wetsuit as far as I remember.

Yeah I remember one part oddly enough. I might send her a PM and ask her about the rifle....think I will. 

[Steve_uk]

Or one part of a wetsuit as far as I remember.

In one of the books it says one part of the wetsuit was at the White House and another part at Bourtree Cottage. Clare Powell's I think.

[Caroline]

Can't believe that wet suit is being discussed again 

[maggie]

Hi Maggie I am sure she told us she has a rifle as well as a wetsuit and other things.   

I am agree, that's what I remember.

[gringo]

She is not a psychiatrist, she is a consultant forensic psychologist

  Forensic psychology is not regarded highly by most actual scientists. It has no credibility and it should be self evident to anyone that personality traits and/or personality disorders cannot be diagnosed using such nonsense.
    Paul Britton was perhaps the "forensic psychologist" that made the subject seem as if it was a new tool in crimefighting. The TV series "Cracker" was based on Paul Britton and it was seen by many as credible.
    What followed was the Colin Stagg debacle and the aftermath of that including disciplinary and misconduct  hearings.
     Most people then realised that clinical psychology is a load of old bollocks and learnt to lend the pronouncements of forensic psychologists the same level of credibility usually reserved for Tarot card readers.

[Steve_uk]

  Forensic psychology is not regarded highly by most actual scientists. It has no credibility and it should be self evident to anyone that personality traits and/or personality disorders cannot be diagnosed using such nonsense.
    Paul Britton was perhaps the "forensic psychologist" that made the subject seem as if it was a new tool in crimefighting. The TV series "Cracker" was based on Paul Britton and it was seen by many as credible.
    What followed was the Colin Stagg debacle and the aftermath of that including disciplinary and misconduct  hearings.
     Most people then realised that clinical psychology is a load of old bollocks and learnt to lend the pronouncements of forensic psychologists the same level of credibility usually reserved for Tarot card readers.

I think there is some truth in this. However it will not stop the speculation as to why a well-heeled young man with apparently everything going for him gambled as he did and ended up throwing it all away.

[Caroline]

  Forensic psychology is not regarded highly by most actual scientists. It has no credibility and it should be self evident to anyone that personality traits and/or personality disorders cannot be diagnosed using such nonsense.
    Paul Britton was perhaps the "forensic psychologist" that made the subject seem as if it was a new tool in crimefighting. The TV series "Cracker" was based on Paul Britton and it was seen by many as credible.
    What followed was the Colin Stagg debacle and the aftermath of that including disciplinary and misconduct  hearings.
     Most people then realised that clinical psychology is a load of old bollocks and learnt to lend the pronouncements of forensic psychologists the same level of credibility usually reserved for Tarot card readers.

Most people realised nothing of the sort, they didn't generalise as you're doing, they simply aimed their criticisms towards Paul Britton. 

[gringo]

I think there is some truth in this. However it will not stop the speculation as to why a well-heeled young man with apparently everything going for him gambled as he did and ended up throwing it all away.

  The speculation as to whether or not that is true is better when it focuses on real evidence rather than the pronouncements of practitioners of discredited pseudosciences as I am sure you will agree Steve.
     

[Caroline]

  The speculation as to whether or not that is true is better when it focuses on real evidence rather than the pronouncements of practitioners of discredited pseudosciences as I am sure you will agree Steve.
   

You mean like the real evidence that points to a phone call to the police from Nevill? That kind of evidence? 

[gringo]

Most people realised nothing of the sort, they didn't generalise as you're doing, they simply aimed their criticisms towards Paul Britton.

  Google forensic psychology and pseudoscience and you will find that they did.
     It is clearly and self evidently nonsense and given that you were relying on graphologists previously for your diagnosis of psychopathy, perhaps you are behind the curve on what is regarded as credible.

[Caroline]

  Google forensic psychology and pseudoscience and you will find that they did.
     It is clearly and self evidently nonsense and given that you were relying on graphologists previously for your diagnosis of psychopathy, perhaps you are behind the curve on what is regarded as credible.

That's utter crap gringo but coming from you not surprising - point me in the direction of where I suggested Jeremy was a psychopath because of his handwriting? I'm certainly not behind any curve ball because I certainly don't give your posts ANY credibility. Perhaps you would be better served by posting credible arguments in support of why Jeremy is innocent instead of playing the Innocent team's answer to Scipio (badly).

[Caroline]

  Google forensic psychology and pseudoscience and you will find that they did.
     It is clearly and self evidently nonsense and given that you were relying on graphologists previously for your diagnosis of psychopathy, perhaps you are behind the curve on what is regarded as credible.

Just in case you missed it, this was my reply to the last time you suggested this!

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,6614.msg300615.html#msg300615

And this one;

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,6614.msg300611.html#msg300611

[Stephanie]

Just in case you missed it, this was my reply to the last time you suggested this!

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,6614.msg300615.html#msg300615

And I do believe it was me who humoured Gringo regarding this.

Just for record, I do not believe someone is a psychopath based on their handwriting or the date on which they were born.

I do however believe JB ticks every box regarding psychopathic traits. I guess you could say his handwriting is the cherry on top.. No humour intended.

[Steve_uk]

And I do believe it was me who humoured Gringo regarding this.

Just for record, I do not believe someone is a psychopath based on their handwriting or the date on which they were born.

I do however believe JB ticks every box regarding psychopathic traits. I guess you could say his handwriting is the cherry on top.. No humour intended.

Someone told me today that the full moon tonight would be affecting their behaviour. I didn't stop to chat.

[Caroline]

Someone told me today that the full moon tonight would be affecting their behaviour. I didn't stop to chat.