"1) The dealer says that on the firearms certificate he recorded that Nevill purchased 500 rounds of Eley 22 long rifle Subsonic Hollow Points"
No, that is not what is recorded at all in the day to day registry....
Again with your strawman deflections and distortions. I am discussing what the dealer said he wrote on the firearms certificate. You either don't have a copy of that certificate thus are in no position to be able to contradict him or have a copy of the certificate but refuse to post it because it confirms what the dealer said and you want to continue to lie and pretend it doesn't state such.
In the meantime the dealer book states 22 Subsonic Hollow Points which means 22LR Subsonic Hollow Points because it is the only Subsonic Hollow points that were being marketed by Eley and more importantly the gun sold to Nevill was chambered in 22LR. Your suggestions that though Nevill wanted ammunition for the rifle he purchased, he was sold ammunition of a different type than his rifle used is ABSURD. He was sold ammunition to use in his rifle, that rifle was chambered in 22LR and thus he was sold 500 rounds of 22LR ammunition. It went without saying that it was 22LR which is why he didn't bother to record it in his sales book as 22LR.
Your nonsense would be akin to looking at the receipt from when I bought my M1911 .45 Colt Pistol and 200 rounds of 45 caliber ammunition and seeing 45 caliber ammo on the receipt and then suggesting that because the receipt doesn't specify it is 45 APC that I likely bought 45 Long ammunition even though that is for a Colt revolver not the pistol I purchased. You are simply trying to play stupid games and look like a dishonest fool by so doing.
22 long rifle is 22LR written out I disagree, it does not say that at all in the day register .
It doesn't have to be written out. 22LR is the default when someone refers to .22 rimfire. He wrote the Anschutz 525 was .22 caliber. The Anschutz 525 is chambered ONLY in 22LR it is not made by the manufacturer in any other caliber. He was referring to 22LR when he wrote 22 caliber for the rifle and when he wrote it for the ammunition. You are just playing stupid games that lead no where.
No, the firearms certificate in Ralph Bambers name, simply states ".22 subsonic", that's all so you won't post it because it proves you a liar I am not a liar, it is recorded as ".22 subsonic"....
Eley only made subsonic in 22LR and 22 short. By your own admission it doesn't state 22 Short subsonic. ".22" means 22LR. It is the default .22 rimfire cartridge. When talking about ANY other cartridge the suffix has to be mentioned. 22 Short is not called simply "22" . The gun was chambered in 22LR and that is the ammunition the dealer sold to Nevill. You are just humiliating yourself suggesting he sold a different caliber than the weapon utilized.
"2) The gun purchased was chambered in 22LR so by definition that means the Eley subsonic hollow points purchased were 22LR"
So, says you, but all the records at source refer to the ammunition sold to Ralph Bamber as .22 subsonic
So says the dealer- the dealers said .22 means 22LR on the forms and logic and custom confirm his claims. It is custom to call .22LR simply ".22" or ".22 rimfire". It is illogical to sell him different ammunition than the rifle used.
"3) Eley didn't make subsonic hollow points in other 22 cartridges only 22LR"
they did, they produced 35 grain cartridges at a time when there was a shortage of .22 rimfire ammunition, worldwide....
Your source claims the 35 grain bullets are 22LR genius and in the meantime your source is wrong the actual grain was 37.5 or 40 depending upon which 22LR Hollow Point was being purchased.
"4) Fletcher stated the 300 plus rounds of unfired ammunition were Eley 22LR subsonic Hollow points" Not in his handwritten notes, he didn't, he simply refers to the individual cartridge cases, as .22 cartridge cases....
So what, he can write any short hand he feels like in his notes. He is free to write .22 instead of 22LR anytime he wants- they mean the same exact thing. If someone used the term .22 unless otherwise specified they mean 22LR. You want to ignore his report simply because it proves you wrong.
5) This was at a time, after cartridge cases were switched in a substitution program, with test fired cartridge cases fired in the anshuzt rifle in what is now known as the unofficial test fire of the anshuzt rifle with Eley control ammunition, followed by an official test fire, again using the anshuzt rifle and Eley control ammunition, and comparison tests were done involving marks found on the unofficial substituted cartridge cases, against markings found on the official test fired Eley control ammunition, with the inevitable conclusion that replaced cartridge cases, and official test fire cases had been fired via the same gun - they used a common trick to fool everybody into thinking that this had been a one good crime, which it wasn't and were identical to the cases of the unfired cartridges.
You have zero support for these allegations they are simply unsupported allegations made up based on nothing other than the desire to pretend that Jeremy was framed and the allegations make no sense at all.
The only unfired 22LR ammunition at WHF before and after the murders was the ammunition purchased by Nevill. The only 22LR gun present to be used in the murders was the ammunition purchased by Nevill. The spent ammunition used int he murders was the ammunition purchased by Nevill. The only 22LR chambered firearm at WHF during and after the murders was the Anschutz.
Your claims to the contrary are not only baseless but worse make no sense and are totally ridiculous. If police found evidence that another weapon and ammunition were brought to the scene and used it would further prove their claims that Sheila wasn't the killer and that woudl further undermine Jeremy's babble about having received a phone call from Nevill claiming sheila was running around with his rifle. Police would not doctor such evidence to Jeremy's benefit. Your claims make zero sense on top of having zero evidentiary support.
But you haven't properly inspected the evidence which I rely upon - what you do, is alter the material I am relying upon, turning it into something it is not, because without altering it you would be dumbstruck. So, you change the evidence by including things what you say, pretending that I said what you said, and then like the proper nut jack that you are, you call me a liar. Well, carry on nutjack, carry on, at the end of the day you are calling yourself a liar, because you have fraudulently altered what I have said, and then you accuse me of saying the things that you yourself have made up and altered....
You haven't posted any evidence to support your claims. Everything you have cited proves the complete opposite of what you assert. You keep intentionally distorting such as trying to sell the absurd tale that Nevill purchased ammo for his rifle that his rifle would not be able to fire. His rifle was chambered in 22LR and that is what Nevill purchased. Your supposed evidence that he didn't doesn't hold up. The "22" on the paperwork means 22LR. The seller said so and the 300 plus rounds of unfired 22LR ammunition at WHF prove it. You are playing worthless games.
Your lied about Cook telling COLP he attached a label marked SJ/1 doesn't hold up either. He stated that he wrote SBJ/1 on the label and on the Holab form. Since this was pointed out so many times to you it means you are not merely wrong but intentionally lying.
In the meantime you offer ZERO evidence that Jones took the moderator from the scene on the day of the murders and zero evidence that bullets and casings were switched by the lab. I am not misreading your proof you offer no proof for such claims. You have no evidentiary basis for such claims these allegations are simply made up out of thin air.
"Complete nonsense. I have challenged you to post a reputable publication be it a book or journal article on ballistics which mentions follower marks having to be on the last case fired by a magazine and that the absence of such proves no cartridge was the last cartridge in the magazine. You can't because such is sheer nonsense."
Nutjack, you keep looking for that material yourself, no doubt if you don't find it, you'll deny that you even looked for it, carry on, it's an open playing field, make up whatever you feel you need to, it'll all be garbage in any event...
You bear the burden of proof as the proponent of the claim. You can't post anything in support of this because it is nonsense. I don't need to prove a negative you bear the burden of proving it.
"How much a bullet breaks up or expands determines whether crimping marks on bullets can even be found on a bullet fragment. Crimping marks do not allow matching a bullet to a particular cartridge"
They do, when the ammunition in question has been manufactured by a different ammunition manufacturer .
You have not produced any evidence that any of the bullet fragments even had crimping marks remaining let alone that it could be demonstrated the bullets were a different brand by such. In the meantime you contradict yourself and claim they were switched.
You have zero basis to make any claims. You just make crap up and that's that.
So says you, who cannot accept real evidence that is documented in the gun dealers register, on the bill of sale, and in Ralph Bambers firearms certificate, and in the hand written notes of Fletcher, where he describes them as .22 cartridges.
It says .22 Anschutz and .22 cartridges. Both mean 22LR- .22= 22LR. The same way when I say my .45 pistol I mean .45 ACP. You are simply playing worthless games and they make you look like a dishonest clown.
