Author Topic: Peter Eatons fingerprints found on bloodstained ammunition box found in cupboard  (Read 7326 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Denial:-

72. While COLP asserts there is no evidence that a sound moderator was found at White House Farm between the 7th-10th August 1985, by the police, (see Allegation 1, paragraphs 1.80 – 1.211). 
« Last Edit: April 03, 2015, 10:22:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Silencer, fingerprinted by DS Davidson, on the 9th August 1985, sensation:-


73. However, COLP knew full well that there was evidence indicating otherwise. They knew that DS Davidson examined a sound moderator for fingerprints on 9th August 1985, (see COLP Précis, Transcript AH/2 Document S 16 paragraph 17). Therefore, the sound moderator in issue at that time cannot have been DRB/1.
 
« Last Edit: April 03, 2015, 10:23:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
DS Davidson admits only one silencer at scene, did not know about other silencer found by family, mystery:-


74. Furthermore it is stated in COLP,  Superintendent McKay: ‘You’ve already told me Neil that you weren’t aware that a sound moderator had been found by the family,’ (COLP Document AB paragraph 35, 16th October 1991) While at page 48 it states, The Case of Jeremy Bamber 22.08.11  Page 11 of 23 
Superintendent Mckay: ‘Knowing there was only one silencer there (White House Farm) did you have knowledge at all of the second silencer?’ (our italics). In addition on page 9 it states, Superintendent Mckay: ‘Do you know on that particular day (8th August 1985) if the silencer was found?’ DS Davidson: ‘No I do not Sir.’
« Last Edit: April 03, 2015, 10:25:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Davidson fingerprinted a silencer (9th August 1985) not found by family:-

75. DS Davidson was the exhibits officer. If he was not informed about a sound moderator being discovered by the family, then who was he instructed had found the sound moderator that he was testing for fingerprints on the 9th August 1985?
« Last Edit: April 03, 2015, 10:26:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Family, did not know police had found other silencer (SJ/1 - SBJ/1) at the scene on the 7th August 1985:-


76. Moreover, Ann Eaton’s testimony to COLP states, Q: ‘Did you or any other person or otherwise, find more than one silencer at White House Farm?’ A: ‘The only silencer found to my knowledge was the one found by my brother David. There never has been any other silencer found at White House Farm,’ (Document C4 page 41).
« Last Edit: April 03, 2015, 10:28:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Police and Family involved in a conspiracy, as a result of merging the two separate sound moderators, as being one and the same:-

78. It is submitted that David Boutflour’s discovery has been tampered with in collusion with other prosecution witnesses, including the police, in order to appear that it was discovered on 10th August 1985 and to avoid the discovery of Anthony Pargeter’s sound moderator, found by DS Jones on the 7th August 1985. Furthermore, the forms relating to the submission of the sound moderator to Huntingdon Laboratory on 13thAugust 1985 illustrate why SBJ/1 the sound moderator found by DS Jones on 7th August 1985 was listed as being found in the gun cupboard, (see photograph img – 3522. CR2, and Document Share File 34, Document D – 10). Thus DS Jones removed the sound moderator from Anthony Pargeter’s .22 gun case and this can be seen in the photograph taken on 7th August 1985.
« Last Edit: April 03, 2015, 10:30:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
There were two sound moderators (the Pargeter one, and the Bamber family one):-

79. Therefore we assert that unlike COLP, its provenance is in issue. Moreover, there is further evidence to support this and it is submitted that COLP clearly disregarded their own findings of fact that there were two sound moderators, which due to the pattern and tenure of the investigation can only be treated as malfeasance. 
« Last Edit: April 03, 2015, 10:31:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Inconsistent:-


80. It is submitted that Glynnis Howard at Huntingdon Forensics was in receipt of sound moderator SBJ/1 on 13th August 1985. While David Boutflour asserted that the sound moderator he had discovered had paint and blood on it. 
« Last Edit: April 03, 2015, 10:31:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
No Paint on silencer examined by Glynis Howard, on the 13th August 1985:-


81. Glynnis Howard at trial, describes her removing blood. She never stated that she had tested the moderator for paint, instead she had discovered both human and animal blood on the moderator, (see document S10). 
« Last Edit: April 03, 2015, 10:32:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Paint not an issue, on the 13th August 1985:-


82. Indeed COLP found that Glynnis Howard was instructed by DI Cook, ‘basically to look for blood on the silencer, (and rifle),’ (see COLP Allegation 2, paragraph 2.53, 001917), thereby implying that the paint was not tested due to it not being in issue.
« Last Edit: April 03, 2015, 10:33:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Paint, not an issue until the 14th August 1985:-


83. Indeed, COLP asserts that the issue of paint on the sound moderator and on the underside of the mantel shelf, were not appreciated until the 14th August 1985, (see paragraph 2.58, 001918).
« Last Edit: April 03, 2015, 10:35:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Paint ignored during silencer examination on 13th August 1985, suggesting at that time, there was no paint present upon it by that stage;-


84. Yet it is logical to infer that while testing the sound moderator SBJ/1, she would in fact have discovered and made a note of the paint on the moderator, notwithstanding that it was not in issue at that time in the proceedings. Indeed David Boutflour was emphatic that there were paint and blood on the moderator that he discovered.
« Last Edit: April 03, 2015, 10:36:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Blood on knurl - did it desolve?


85. It is submitted that to test the blood dry it is first dissolved in distilled water, therefore the blood would have dissolved leaving the red paint (which was gloss), that would then have to be recorded on the laboratory notes and examined. 
« Last Edit: April 03, 2015, 10:38:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Blood found in the ridges of the knurl pattern around end of silencer during examination on the 13th August 1985:-


86. Glynnis Howard was cross examined at the trial in 1986 about the blood on the sound moderator, 
A: ‘There was some blood staining actually in the knurled end.’ Q: ‘On the outside but in the holes?’ A: ‘The actual ridges formed dips in the surface and the blood was actually in those,’ (see document S11B, page 125 at D).
« Last Edit: April 03, 2015, 10:39:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Only paint ingrained in knurl of silencer, when examined on the 25th September 1985 (what happened to blood observed there by Howard a month earlier):-


87. While Brian Elliott the other forensic scientist at Huntingdon Laboratory found paint on the knurled end of the moderator on the 25th September 1985. He stated at trial, Q: ‘Did you discover anything on that?’ (sound moderator) A: ‘Yes, the end of the sound moderator I described as knurled.’ Q: ‘Yes.’ A: ‘And impacted into this pattern are numerous small deposits of paint which showed the layers, the undercoat layers that I have already described.’ 
« Last Edit: April 03, 2015, 10:41:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...