Peter Eaton picked up the box multiple times including to hand to police so his prints being found on it is not a surprise.
Peter Eaton did not handle the box of ammunition at all once David Boutflour recovered it from the scene on the 10th August 1985. There is no reference anywhere to that in any of his witness statements, testimony or interviews by CILP, so I don't know where you have got that idea from. Now the presence of this bloodstained ammunition box in the relatives possession between the 10th August and the 11th September 1985 is very wording indeed, because it demonstrates in the clearest possible terms that blood from the crime scene was transported away from the scene by the relatives and kept by them for a whole month before Ann Eaton hand it over to DC Oakley on the 11th September 1985. This was in addition to the relatives removing from the scene on the 10th August 1985, a sound moderator also contaminated with blood, later attributed as belonging exclusively to Sheila Caffell, took it away and kept by themselves for a whole month until Annie Eaton also handed it over to DC Oakley on the 11th September 1985. As if all of this isn't bad enough, please hang fire because I have even more alarming revelations to make, because relatives also had possession for a whole month between 10th August and the 11th September 1985, a solitary round of Eley .22LR subsonic hollow point ammunition with a spot of blood upon it, (part of lab' item no. 93, exhibit DRH/22), which again Annie Eaton handed over to DC Oakley on the 11th September 1985...
Relatives whisked three separate evidential exhibits away from the scene on the 10th August 1985, all of which were bloodstained in respect or another, (1) sound moderator, DRB/1, (2) box of ammunition DRB/2, and (3) a solitary round of .22 Eley subsonic hollow point ammunition (which eventually became part of DRH/22, lab' item no. 93)...
I am still not yet done, because on the 12th September 1985, David Boutflour met police at the scene (whf) and from within the very same gun cupboard in the downstairs office, he removed the metal ring that normally fitted onto the screw thread end of the anshuzt rifle barrel, and he gave it to the police. Now technically speaking this threaded metal ring was the end part of the anshuzt rifles barrel, and arguably just as significant as any sound moderator later introduced to help to convict Jeremy Bamber of the murders. This is because it was a component part of the rifle which police and their experts say belonged to the only weapon used in the shootings - yet, despite David Boutflour handing the end of the anshuzt rifle. Barrel over to police at the scene on the 12th September 1985, police try to conceal its existence or recovery because its very existence has the potential to seriously undermine the evidence of all these different moderators that were merged together as the same one, bearing at least four different exhibit references. SJ/1, SBJ/1, DB/1, CAE or AE/1, and DRB/1...
We are now very close to understanding exactly how corrupted police officers and dishonest relatives worked together to fabricate the key evidence used in the prosecution of Jeremy Bamber for these murders...
In addition to these matters, let us also not forget that Annie Eaton also removed from the scene on the 10th August 1985, a pair of heavily bloodstained knickers belonging to the victim Sheila Caffell. Annie took them away from the scene in the boot of her car, along with the moderator (DRB/1), the bloodstained box of ammunition, and the solitary round of Eley .22 ammunition with a spit of blood upon it...
All of this collectively, is too serious to ignore...
