to be honest I don't really have an opinion on this.
I do know that as a woman I find it extremely surprising that she left sanitary objects just around her parents house ( not in her own bedroom discreetly) because most women would never do that - or clothes soaking in the kitchen ( especially when there was a "back kitchen" scullery area).
As for the rest its probably as unlikely as JB committing the murders in a wetsuit or naked - and or cycling across fields/ footpaths on a sit up and beg bike without lights.
That's why I don't have an opinion - If we have to accept the seemingly impossible for guilt why not for innocent ?
More falsehoods and cop-outs that seems to be all you are capable of.
1) The buckets of clothing were found in the back kitchen. Photos among other things demonstrate this. You intentionally ignore such so you can try to make a controversy though leaving clothing to soak in a kitchen is not that unusual anyway.
2) You say it is odd for her to leave the packaging from the tampon in the house instead of garbage bu you refuse to offer any opinion on what is by far the most absurd claim ever made in this case. That right there says much about you.
3) To avoid discussing the actual question you engage in your usual strawmen arguments. The issue of Jeremy committing the crime naked or in a wetsuit was not asked of you. Most who believe Jeremy is guilty don't believe he wore anything besides his normal clothing. He had the ability to change his clothes at WHF after the murders because he had a room still there with clothing in it and also had the ability to change after he got home. He also had the ability to bath at WHF or his own house. He had no need to wear special protective clothing. Using a bike as opposed to car to and from WHF is a matter of preference and either is possible.
Wearing protective clothing and biking to and from WHF is much more rational thought than the nonsense being spewed by Leb of using the moderator for a tampon which still would not be able to account for the blood found in the moderator. Anyone willing to support such nonsense by refusing to dispute it is simply admitting they are too biased to face any issue in this case rationally.