Author Topic: Jeremy's first 10/11 shots:  (Read 1727 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44328
Jeremy's first 10/11 shots:
« on: March 02, 2015, 12:29:PM »
Nothing is impossible.

But to kill Sheila first would mean taking her into the main bedroom, where two other alive adults were.

To shoot the twins first would risk waking up three other adults. With Jeremy only having 2/3 bullets left. Meaning he would have to re load, or enter the main bedroom with just three bullets.

It is almost certain he entered the main bedroom first, fully loaded. To attempt to kill/incapacitate the two people who provided the biggest threat to his attempt. This is the common sense approach as it didn't matter how many bullets were fired into June and Neville, so he would have fired off all 10/11 shots. Knowing it was a weak rifle.

His first shots were very nearly successful in setting up a smooth completion. 

« Last Edit: March 02, 2015, 01:09:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Online lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48672
Re: Jeremy's first 10/11 shots:
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2015, 12:54:PM »
Pass.

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy's first 10/11 shots:
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2015, 02:16:PM »
N/A

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Jeremy's first 10/11 shots:
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2015, 02:16:PM »
Huh?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: Jeremy's first 10/11 shots:
« Reply #4 on: March 02, 2015, 03:48:PM »
Adam has to be the greatest self publicist the forum has ever had the misfortune to have on board. He seems to create polls merely to allow himself the pleasure of responding.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Jeremy's first 10/11 shots:
« Reply #5 on: March 02, 2015, 03:50:PM »
Adam has to be the greatest self publicist the forum has ever had the misfortune to have on board. He seems to create polls merely to allow himself the pleasure of responding.

AHHHHHH!!!! You broke the one word response April!  ;D ;D ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: Jeremy's first 10/11 shots:
« Reply #6 on: March 02, 2015, 03:55:PM »
AHHHHHH!!!! You broke the one word response April!  ;D ;D ;D ;D



 :-X :-X....................Defecation????? ;) ;) ;) ;D

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Jeremy's first 10/11 shots:
« Reply #7 on: March 02, 2015, 04:48:PM »
This issue is a significant one though.

The first shots clearly were the parents in the bedroom.  This is a very big problem for Jeremy supporters because it is difficult to come up with any credible way for Nevill to have the opportunity to phone Jeremy.  When this is added to the lack of reason why he would phone Jeremy and Jeremy's actions which demonstrate he didn't receive such a call, the evidence Sheila didn't kill herself or anyone else and Julie's testimony the evidence against Jeremy is overwhelming.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Online lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48672
Re: Jeremy's first 10/11 shots:
« Reply #8 on: March 02, 2015, 04:55:PM »
This issue is a significant one though.

The first shots clearly were the parents in the bedroom.  This is a very big problem for Jeremy supporters because it is difficult to come up with any credible way for Nevill to have the opportunity to phone Jeremy.  When this is added to the lack of reason why he would phone Jeremy and Jeremy's actions which demonstrate he didn't receive such a call, the evidence Sheila didn't kill herself or anyone else and Julie's testimony the evidence against Jeremy is overwhelming.


This issue is a significant one though



You're going to say that,aren't you ??




Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Jeremy's first 10/11 shots:
« Reply #9 on: March 02, 2015, 05:17:PM »

This issue is a significant one though



You're going to say that,aren't you ??

And he is posted these threads to highlight how you and other Jeremy supporters keep hiding from this issue.  Your hiding enables him and provokes him. If you would answer we would be spared from these threads.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Jeremy's first 10/11 shots:
« Reply #10 on: March 02, 2015, 05:36:PM »
And he is posted these threads to highlight how you and other Jeremy supporters keep hiding from this issue.  Your hiding enables him and provokes him. If you would answer we would be spared from these threads.

Sorry scipio you are mistaken . Do a search on his threads and you will see he has been given "scenarios" ( because that's all they are , even yours) , he just ignores them .

Online lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48672
Re: Jeremy's first 10/11 shots:
« Reply #11 on: March 02, 2015, 05:37:PM »
And he is posted these threads to highlight how you and other Jeremy supporters keep hiding from this issue.  Your hiding enables him and provokes him. If you would answer we would be spared from these threads.






Who's hiding ? I'm very vocal in my support, I think.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Jeremy's first 10/11 shots:
« Reply #12 on: March 02, 2015, 05:38:PM »
By the way - I think the vote in this thread is crass.

It is  not taking into account that the murders were never a "sensible" act >:(

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: Jeremy's first 10/11 shots:
« Reply #13 on: March 02, 2015, 05:44:PM »
By the way - I think the vote in this thread is crass.

It is  not taking into account that the murders were never a "sensible" act >:(


Why worry, Lookout. He doesn't create threads for your benefit....................or anyone else's except maybe his own. He's probably the only one who responds to them.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Jeremy's first 10/11 shots:
« Reply #14 on: March 02, 2015, 05:50:PM »
I said that not lookout. And I am not worried - just angry with him being so insensitive .

So wrong person.