I'm not sure the Trawnikis were exclusively Ukrainian. In any event you have made the case for the Jews to return to their own homeland.
The notion that "the Jews" have "their" homeland is indefensible horseshit. Given that anyone can convert and become a "Jew", how is that person now entitled to land that they have no connection to? Is "Jewishness" a race or a religion? It depends on the duplicitous argument being made.
I could argue that myself and all of my direct family are "entitled" to our own "homeland" in Ghana or Nigeria with a far more convincing and direct case than the bullshit entitlements of Zionists.
In 1834 slaves in Antigua and the wider Caribbean were emancipated. Amongst those emancipated slaves was one "William Jordan Rice Watson". This was obviously the slave owners name which was taken up by WJR Watson-the emancipated slave. WJR Watson ended up in Hull, eventually lost at sea on a whaling ship but not before marrying and having children. His eldest son, also William Jordan Rice Watson, was the father of my grandfather(my mother's dad).
The slaves on Antigua mostly came from the Gold Coast and the Bight of Biafra(now parts of Ghana and Nigeria). The emancipated slave WJR Watson, or his parents, were removed/stolen from their land in Africa and transported to the Caribbean.
To be clear, I don't think that I am entitled to any land in Ghana or Nigeria. Nor do I feel entitled to any part of Antigua, although we do plan to visit on a family holiday
My own, and my direct family's, connection to that land is far closer and more real and definable than the Zionist myth.
