Remember the Admiral Kuznetzov and how it was a source of great hilarity as it sailed through the English Channel billowing smoke on its way to the Med and Syria. The decrepit state of the ship, we were told, a metaphor for the state of the entire Russian Armed Forces.
In light of the debacle of the HMS Prince of Wales, we should perhaps wonder, if this is also a metaphor for the state and capability of the entire UK/NATO armed forces.
To be fair to the Admiral Kuznetzov, despite its appearance, it did in fact sail from the Barents Sea to the Med and completed its mission. That being so, a more reasonable description would be that it looks old and inefficient but is resilient, more efficient than appearances suggest and does everything asked of it.
Now let's do the HMS Prince of Wales

Our 2 years old £3 billion + Aircraft carrier that has spent only 87 days at sea in 2 years, has no aircraft yet and broke down without making it out of the Solent on its "landmark mission" to "shape the future of stealth jet and drone operations", is now limping back to port and will likely have to go to Amsterdam for repairs, as we lack the dry dock facilities to repair our £3 billion + aircraft carrier.
The equivalent of me leaving my house in Hull, on my way to London, failing to make it beyond the top of my street driving a Ferrari whilst taking the piss out of my neighbours Skoda which goes to London and back problem free regularly.
And now I have to send my Ferrari to Italy for repair.
The state of the HMS Prince of Wales is a fitting metaphor for the UK and entire NATO armed forces. Over-priced, over-extended and over-rated.