Russia - worrying?

[David1819]

   More diversions because you cannot find an answer to the inconvenient facts that destroy the narrative that you adhere to.
     Russia, China trade is surging you absolute idiot

When the debate is lost. Insults become the tool of the loser.

[gringo]

 David;When the debate is lost. Insults become the tool of the loser.

   You aren't in any debate because you can't answer questions. And after throwing around terms like conspiritard, useful idiot (about an hour ago) as well as attempts to insult by Gif,  it defies credibility that that you posted that with a straight face.

    The point and implication that you raised was proven to be wrong, as I showed with my reply and links.
You are really embarrassingly bad at this. Are you now going to debunk my reply to your China/Russia trade post?
    And why have you still not formulated a response to the threat of genocide against his own citizens and explicitly the children by Ukrainian President Poroshenko?

[David1819]

Exports to Russia from China decreased to 3825254.66 USD in March from 12617700 USD in February of 2022. source: China Customs

https://tradingeconomics.com/china/exports-to-russia

[gringo]

Exports to Russia from China decreased to 3825254.66 USD in March from 12617700 USD in February of 2022. source: China Customs

https://tradingeconomics.com/china/exports-to-russia

    David. You have referred to China's exports to Russia, only in  March and February. What about the imports from Russia? Article after article from around the world tells the same story. Surging China Russia trade. There is no-one who claims that China/Russia trade is decreasing rather than increasing. Google "China Russia trade 2022" and get back to me.
    Trade, funnily enough David, includes imports and exports. So you can't debunk the widely reported surging China Russia trade narrative for the obvious reason that you are hopelessly ill informed and plain wrong.
    Now have a go at the Poroshenko genocide question.

[David1819]

China’s Exports to Russia Slump After Ukraine Invasion.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-13/china-s-exports-to-russia-slump-after-invasion-of-ukraine

[David1819]

Two Ukrainian Su-27 striking Russian facilities on the famous Snake Island in the Black Sea, in remarkable footage filmed by a TB-2 drone. As we can observe, there is serious damage

https://liveuamap.com/en/2022/7-may-two-ukrainian-su27-striking-russian-facilities-on-the

The Ukrainian air force is still alive!

https://v.redd.it/cf625mbie4y81/DASH_720.mp4

[David1819]

Destroying a Russian helicopter on Snake Island

https://v.redd.it/upbplwhe87y81/DASH_360.mp4

[David1819]

Russia is burning again. A big fire has broke out in the center of Perm one of many sabotage operations across Russian territory

https://v.redd.it/0bfrebjdy8y81/DASH_720.mp4

[Steve_uk]

    David. You have referred to China's exports to Russia, only in  March and February. What about the imports from Russia? Article after article from around the world tells the same story. Surging China Russia trade. There is no-one who claims that China/Russia trade is decreasing rather than increasing. Google "China Russia trade 2022" and get back to me.
    Trade, funnily enough David, includes imports and exports. So you can't debunk the widely reported surging China Russia trade narrative for the obvious reason that you are hopelessly ill informed and plain wrong.
    Now have a go at the Poroshenko genocide question.

He's probably referring to those Russian-backed terrorists who shot down a passenger airliner. https://youtu.be/-gPJUDOnMfg

[gringo]

Now have a go at the Poroshenko genocide question.

He's probably referring to those Russian-backed terrorists who shot down a passenger airliner. https://youtu.be/-gPJUDOnMfg

     At least you attempted to answer the question, but it is impossible that he was referring to "Russian backed terrorists", unless those "terrorists" were schoolchildren.
     Here is the relevant part of the quote again for you, Steve;
     "Our children go to schools and nurseries, yours will hide in basements"

     He was definitely referring to schoolchildren and, let's not forget, nursery age children. He appears to be an equal opportunity Nazi at least.
     This is what you are attempting to whitewash, Steve.
     

[Steve_uk]

Now have a go at the Poroshenko genocide question.

     At least you attempted to answer the question, but it is impossible that he was referring to "Russian backed terrorists", unless those "terrorists" were schoolchildren.
     Here is the relevant part of the quote again for you, Steve;
     "Our children go to schools and nurseries, yours will hide in basements"

     He was definitely referring to schoolchildren and, let's not forget, nursery age children. He appears to be an equal opportunity Nazi at least.
     This is what you are attempting to whitewash, Steve.
   

I've no way of checking the translation but he does put it in the future tense, thus to my mind implying there will be conflict in the future for the terrorists and their offspring.

Is this what Mother Russia is doing right now..https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-61369229

[gringo]

      Just so that you are in no doubt about who and what you are acting as apologists and enablers of; War graves in Nijmegen, Holland, were vandalised a few days ago. Take a look at their handiwork,

https://twitter.com/Taurevanime/status/1522454058430353408

[Steve_uk]

      Just so that you are in no doubt about who and what you are acting as apologists and enablers of; War graves in Nijmegen, Holland, were vandalised a few days ago. Take a look at their handiwork,

https://twitter.com/Taurevanime/status/1522454058430353408

Nobody is apologizing for Poroshenko's remarks or the Azov regiment: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/3/1/who-are-the-azov-regiment

[gringo]

Just so that you are in no doubt about who and what you are acting as apologists and enablers of; War graves in Nijmegen, Holland, were vandalised a few days ago. Take a look at their handiwork,

Nobody is apologizing for Poroshenko's remarks or the Azov regiment: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/3/1/who-are-the-azov-regiment

   
  Apologist; a person who offers an argument in defence of something controversial.

   I didn't suggest that you were apologising for Poroshenko's comments or for the Azov Nazis. I was pointing out that you are (offering an argument in defence of something controversial) acting as an apologist for Nazis.

[gringo]

I've no way of checking the translation but he does put it in the future tense, thus to my mind implying there will be conflict in the future for the terrorists and their offspring.

Is this what Mother Russia is doing right now..https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-61369229

    There are plenty of ways of checking the translation, we live in the information age, Steve. It should have provoked at least a little intellectual curiosity from you. There is no denying that Poroshenko made that statement.
     Do you have any comment on the footage of US Senators Graham and McCain promising that 2017 would be the "year of offence" against Russia from Ukraine. Would you agree that it blows a hole in the Russian aggression narrative. No need to check any translations with that one either; it's in English.