0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
If posters cannot give a plausible explanation of how Sheila did the massacre, they must stop supporting Jeremy. All the crime scene evidence is available. I am doing them a favour by stopping them continuing to support a murderer. It is not advice from me I am offering. But pre stance change moral support. I could not give you any as I was not expecting you're change. So could not offer you support. Lookout wobbled a few months ago after my 'Sheila on the night' thread. I gave her the option of sending me a pre stance change PM. But she decided to still support Jeremy. Without explanation. It's no good supporters refusing to say how Sheila did it. Saying 'we weren't there'. Then discuss the socks, lights, chairs and June's movements. Or say why Jeremy couldn't do it. I have to currently agree with Leo Mckinstry and say any current support on here is 'creepy'.
You can't tell people what to think, it's up to them. I would agree that it's 'creepy' to support a murderer , but it's hardly creepy to support someone you think is innocent. No one is saying they believe Jeremy is guilty but that they still support him irrespectively.
If I'm not mistaken,my posts are being deleted ??
??
No there not Lookout....I've just looked in the log and no one has deleted or removed your posts...Are you on the sherry hahahaha
Socks, June moving to Neville's side of the bed & back again, moved chairs, smashed lights. It is good that there is discussion about aspects of the case that in no way highlight guilt or innocence for either person. For people to still post and argue that Jeremy is innocent would be wrong.
The disarray happened before they entered WHF.
You missed my deadline. So have to change stance. Explaining by just saying Sheila used a rifle just highlights this. Feel free to PM me if struggling.
How can you support someone, when there is only one other suspect. But you can't say how the only other suspect could have committed the massacre ?
