Can you please show me the evidence proving June was definitely shot 6 times in a row
Four shots from a .22 rifle at close range will inflict serious damage considering some where head shots.
The serious damage is the whole point. Because of the serious damage she already would have been dead by the time the killer returned upstairs following the kitchen altercation. Only the shot between her eyes could have been fired at that point.
4 of June's wounds were definitely inflicted while she was in bed. One of these is the wound severely damaged her skull.
Entrance wounds;
1) Above right ear/ inflicted while lying in bed/ severe head damage would kill her rapidly
2) Lower right Neck / inflicted while sitting in bed based on the exit wound/ severity not described
3) right forearm/ inflicted while lying in bed
4) right knee/ inflicted while lying in bed
5) right upper chest/ inflicted while sitting, getting up or virtually upright/ caused severe bleeding still alive when inflicted
6) right lower chest / inflicted while sitting, getting up or virtually upright/ caused severe bleeding still alive while inflicted
7) Between the eyes/ inflicting while lying on the floor based on back spatter on door
Note how 6 wounds were all the the right side of her body the only bullet that wasn't is the one that was between her eyes. That they were all to the right supports the killer firing the 6 shots from relatively the same position. That is one hint they were fired in succession. It is possible for all 6 to have been delivered while she was in bed. If she wasn't in bed when 5 and 6 were fired then she was either getting out of bed or practically standing upright.
The severity of the head wound she suffered in bed means that by the time the events in the kitchen finished and the killer reloaded and came back upstairs she would have been lying on the floor. With her body lying on the floor wounds 5 and 6 can't have been delivered the wound tracts are only able to fit someone sitting in bed, getting up out of bed or standing virtually upright. Moreover, wounds 5 and 6 resulted in a lot of blood filling the chest. Had bullets 5, 6 and 7 been delivered together then 5 and 6 would not have caused so much blood to fill the chest.
It is obvious based on everything that June was shot at least 6 times in a row as she was in bed and getting out of bed and then after she got up she collapsed on the floor and was shot again between the eyes. That shot could have come before the struggle in the kitchen or after. There is no way to know for sure because the gun could hold 11 rounds. We have no way to know whether it had 11 rounds at the outset or 11 rounds after the kitchen encounter which is what Harters believes happened. Sheila didn't even know how the use the gun so would not have had any clue how to get the gun to hold 11 rounds. Jeremy might have known how to accomplish such and could have chosen to do so figuring he wanted the maximum number of rounds available. He did need to kill 5 people after all. Whether Jeremy did have the foresight to do so we have no way to know as he is never going to tell us.
After knocking Nevill out the killer reloaded the gun with at least 4 bullets. If the killer loaded 5 or more rounds instead of just 4 that results in 1 being in the chamber still after killing Nevill. Upon refilling the magazine that means 11 rounds in the gun. So it would be possible to accidentally load 11 rounds. Harters thinks that is what happened and that is why he thinks the 7th shot to June was after the kitchen episode as opposed to before.
If one wants to argue Sheila did it they are forced to argue this because Sheila would never have known that 11 rounds could be loaded into the gun. It would have been accidental after the kitchen incident. I have seen a lot of cases where killers initially load a round in the chamber and then maximum rounds in the magazine so that in their initial magazine load they have maximum firepower. This is especially the case when there are not additional loaded magazines at the ready. So I am much more willing to think that Jeremy might have done that.
