I agree. Neither do those who believe him to be guilty have to use much brain power either, because of the simple fact that he has already been found guilty by ten people so all they have to do is reiterate the so called evidence against him and they never ever criticise that evidence as we do. Rather it is easier for them to criticise us by saying that we are against the cops or the relatives or Mugford. They never ever try to pull the evidence apart, but rather accept it as it was accepted in court. As you say and you have felt it as well. In a lot of those who think Bamber guilty there I detect a kind of wallowing in the glee and hatred of Bamber. Furthermore they justify their actions by saying things like, "Well he deserves such hatred, because two liitle kids were murdered", thereby feigning a kind of concern for those kids.
This is where you are dishonest. I did evaluate the evidence that convicted Jeremy and there is nothing to rebut it. The trial defense failed to rebut it, the defense on appeal has failed to rebut it and you and the other people who insist he is innocent have failed to rebut it.
You choose to believe Jeremy is innocent even though you have nothing to rebut the evidence that convicted him. Whatever you come up with to try to rebut it is just wild speculation that you have no evidence to actually prove occurred. For example speculating that Julie lied and he police and famiy got together and fabricated evidence. Tossed in for good measure is the claim Sheila washed herself and changed her clothes though there is no reason why she would do so but it is chalked up to, "she was crazy so would have done senseless things".
There is considerable evidence establishing the June and Nevill were shot in the bedroom where June died, but an injured Nevill traveled to the kitchen where he was beaten and shot to death, then the boys and Sheila were killed. A phone call to Jeremy from the kitchen makes no sense and doesn't fit in at all let alone for Nevill or Sheila to hang up the phone then take it off the hook again and leave it off the hook so no one could call the house. There is unrebutted evidence that Sheila can't have killed herself or anyone else.
I looked at what would be required for the blood to have been planted in the moderator in an objective fashion. Only the lab had the skill and knowledge to do that. Since the family said it saw blood that would require them to have been contacted and corrupted into making such false claim to hide that the lab planted it. In the meantime the lab had to have removed blood from the rifle and concealed that fact. If the lab was going to lie like that all they would have to have done then was to lie and say they found blood when they didn't and pretend they did tests so could have said they found AK1 enzymes throughout. Since Lincoln found microscopic traces of group A blood on the first 8 baffles that means they had to have done more than just test blood and say they found it inside they had to have planted it, let it dry and then scraped it whatever was visible. Aside from not having the know how to plant the blood the police demonstrated they didn't plant it by not making the lab do a thorough serological test of the blood right away. There is concrete evidence that the blood was there by 8/14/85 because there is evidence that on that date police were notified that plaint was found on the moderator and human blood was found on and inside the moderator. So the blood had to have been planted by then. Instead of having the lab follow up to type test the blood, the police spent the next few weeks fingerprinting it. If they had planted blood so that it could be used to establish Sheila was murdered they would have wanted the lab to immediately do thorough blood testing, not to be worried about looking for fingerprints and super glue fuming it. There is no accidental way for the quantity of blood found inside in the distribution it was found inside to have gotten inside by accident. It got there by being sprayed there. It was either drawback from a contact shot or planted and if it was planted then blood had ot have been found in the rifle which was concealed.
There is unrebutted evidence that Sheila's fatal shot was a contact wound which would result in drawback. There is unrebutted testimony that no blood was found in the rifle. Thus the evidence to establish the blood in the moderator was drawback is unrebutted. There is also evidence Sheila's body was moved after her death but while she was still bleeding which means someone else had to have been there. She had no ability to change from the gown she died in and if she had shot herself she would have to have hugged the weapon and soot and GSR would have exited the vents and ejection port and gotten on her gown.
You are not following the evidence you are speculating the evidence is doctored and fabricated though you have no evidence to establish it was and when asked why you speculate it is because you don't trust police or the family so not for any fact based reason. You can't pull the evidence apart but don't care you still refuse to accept it anyway.
So don't pretend that the evidence was rebutted and that people who think he is guilty are ignoring that. The whole reason he is still in prison is because the evidence that convicted him has not been rebutted. Supporters speculate witnesses lied and the evidence was fabricated but have no evidence to prove it.
When you believe something you can't prove you are taking a leap of faith. That is what his supporters do. Some supporters are people who believe he is guilty but pretend they believe he isn't and do such as opportunists who use the case for their own purposes. it is about them not Jeremy the case is just a vehicle for them.
