Human blood in the silencer:

[Adam]

Stands to sense really that Sheila with blood and gubbins on her hand/s handled the silencer but didn't necessarily screw it onto the rifle.

The testing was done to the inside of the silencer only.

[Adam]

488. In order to test for DNA within the moderator, the moderator was dismantled and the seventeen baffles were divided into three groups for analysis; A) baffles 1-7, being those closest to the bullet exiting end, B) baffles 8-11 and C) baffles 12-17. This was done because there was an expectation that the amount of DNA on any single baffle would be very small. Thus in order to have the best chance of obtaining a DNA profile, each group was swabbed with the same swab rather than using a separate swab for each baffle.


The most surprising thing is June's DNA being found. It is doubtful she had anything to do with the rifles and components. That was all Neville.

[lookout]

The testing was done to the inside of the silencer only.

And ? Liquid finds its own level-----downwards.

[sami]

Haven't you worked it out yet ? My my you're slow with that one.

i think your the one that is slow.the tests done before were basic.no doubt if they were done today they would show sheilas dna.you only raise questions about evidence that cannot be proved one way or another.why dont you tell us your thoery of how sheila committed the crime .your own thoughts not mikes.we will see if they stand up to scrutany

[lookout]

i think your the one that is slow.the tests done before were basic.no doubt if they were done today they would show sheilas dna.you only raise questions about evidence that cannot be proved one way or another.why dont you tell us your thoery of how sheila committed the crime .your own thoughts not mikes.we will see if they stand up to scrutany

 I don't answer to hardfaced sods like you whoever you are,but it's clear to see you have a purpose and it isn't just debating.

[Caroline]

 I don't answer to hardfaced sods like you whoever you are,but it's clear to see you have a purpose and it isn't just debating.

That was a perfectly reasonable question and it was case based. You clearly can't answer so have done what you usually do, gone on the defensive and started to attack. No wonder we don't get new members - you're showing yourself to be hard faced.

[lookout]

That was a perfectly reasonable question and it was case based. You clearly can't answer so have done what you usually do, gone on the defensive and started to attack. No wonder we don't get new members - you're showing yourself to be hard faced.

I've followed that side-kick of yours and it's here to annoy-------nothing else !!

[Caroline]

I've followed that side-kick of yours and it's here to annoy-------nothing else !!

If that were true, they certainly wouldn't be alone!

[sami]

 I don't answer to hardfaced sods like you whoever you are,but it's clear to see you have a purpose and it isn't just debating.

stop the name calling sod. cause when i start .you/ll know about it.when people like you say a rude word to me i wiil allways return it with interest .so lets stop here.thanks

[Caroline]

stop the name calling sod. cause when i start .you/ll know about it.when people like you say a rude word to me i wiil allways return it with interest .so lets stop here.thanks

Good ere in'it? 

[lookout]

stop the name calling sod. cause when i start .you/ll know about it.when people like you say a rude word to me i wiil allways return it with interest .so lets stop here.thanks

Yes,I bet you can give as good !! I can feel it.

[Jane]

Yes,I bet you can give as good !! I can feel it.

Lookout, that is THOROUGHLY nasty. What the hell has Sami done to you, OTHER that say he/she things Jeremy is guilty. If he/she had said they thought Jeremy was innocent, you'd be all over them like a rash.

[lookout]

Lookout, that is THOROUGHLY nasty. What the hell has Sami done to you, OTHER that say he/she things Jeremy is guilty. If he/she had said they thought Jeremy was innocent, you'd be all over them like a rash.

Blind are you ? Have you not noticed the remarks made after my posts. ?

"All over them like a rash".Like you are because he/she is a guilter ??

[Caroline]

Blind are you ? Have you not noticed the remarks made after my posts. ?

"All over them like a rash".Like you are because he/she is a guilter ??

You have been nasty to Sami since he she arrived!

[Jane]

Blind are you ? Have you not noticed the remarks made after my posts. ?

"All over them like a rash".Like you are because he/she is a guilter ??

I speak as I find, Lookout, and I don't THINK I'm guilty of attacking first. I haven't noticed this trait in Sami, either, but it seems you don't think he/she has the right to ask questions without you having a go first.