AK1 was present,no human blood--------rabbits,chickens,etc.
You and David keep making this pathetic claim. Evidence has been presented time and again proving you to be wrong so at this point either you are too biased to face the truth, too dishonest to admit the truth or too clueless to understand the truth.
The lab found human blood on the outside of the moderator but the quantity of blood was too small to effectively test the blood type. It was a few tiny particles of high velocity spatter. It tested positive as human blood.
Inside the lab removed a large quantity of blood from the baffles, they removed all visible blood. They tested a flake as well as a swabbing from the upper baffle plates. Both came back as human group A blood. In addition the flake had the AK1 enzyme so was consistent with Sheila's blood not June's.
From the 2002 COA decision:
"No questions were asked at trial of Mr Hayward to establish what part of the blood he had tested. The position was, however, known to the defence through their own expert Dr Lincoln. Dr Lincoln had seen the evidential material upon which the group testing results were based and agreed with the conclusions. He recorded that evidence in the course of his report of 19 September 1986.
He said that Mr Hayward had "found a flake of blood trapped under the first or second baffle plate" and that it was this flake that was tested and produced the groupings A, EAP BA, AK1, Hp2.1 upon which reliance was placed by the prosecution. Dr Lincoln further recorded: "Mr Hayward states that he could detect visible staining on the "upper baffle plates" and that he swabbed these plates so that the blood was taken onto cotton material which could subsequently be used in grouping tests. On this material Mr Hayward successfully determined the ABO and EAP groups and showed the blood to be groups A, EAP BA."This finding from the swabbing of the upper baffle plates was thus consistent with blood from either June Bamber or Sheila Caffell or even a combination of blood from the two of them but not in any way from blood from Nevill Bamber or Nicholas Caffell.
We have set out at paragraphs 75 to 80 a summary of the evidence at trial relating to the scientific examination of the moderator. The critical part of that evidence was the analysis of the flake of dried blood found inside the sound moderator. The evidence was given by Mr Hayward, a biologist who was working at the Forensic Science Laboratory at the time of the examination although he was in private practice by the date of trial. In his evidence he described how he had found "a considerable amount of blood" inside the moderator deposited in the spaces to the sides of the baffles around the edge of the silencer. He was asked if he had tested "any" of that blood.
He said that he had and that it was human blood. He said that he had obtained grouping reactions for group A, EAP BA, AK I, Hp 2-1. He had done a PGM grouping test but it gave negative results. He said that these grouping results were consistent with the blood coming from Sheila Caffell but not solely from any of the others who had been shot.
In dealing with this evidence, the defence were limited by the evidence available from their own expert. They called no such evidence at trial but the material that they had obtained pre-trial has been disclosed in the course of this appeal. The defence had instructed Dr Patrick Lincoln, whose expertise in such matters was well known. On 29 April 1986, he visited the forensic science laboratory and examined the relevant material. He carried out tests on all seventeen baffles. The first eight plates all gave weak or very weak positive reactions for blood. There was no blood clearly visible to the naked eye and Dr Lincoln concluded that "such findings could be consistent with an item having been previously swabbed by a forensic scientist to remove blood stains for testing". The other nine plates "did not produce any evidence for the presence of blood".
He agreed with Mr Hayward's conclusion that the combination of blood groups revealed in his testing of the inside of the moderator could have come solely from Sheila Caffell but did not come from any one of the other individuals"
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2002/2912.htmlIt is well known that the lab tested 2 samples of blood from the moderator. It is well known that the lab found the baffle swabbing was group A blood and that the flake was group A blood that had the AK1 enzyme so was consistent with Sheila's blood not June's. It is well known defense expert Lincoln agreed with the findings.
When you deny this you look like a fool or liar. I could simply tell you to repeat the claims so you look foolish but I am trying to help you so that you don't make such silly claims.
