Photographic still image taken from crime scene video - The shocking truth...

[mike tesko]

Hiding from the truth never got anyone anywhere...

The photo's I posted are of Sheila, and at Hillsboro' some fans were to blame for some of the deaths in the crush...

Lets get the facts right about Hillsboro', there were two build ups of pressure created by fans arriving late at the Leppings Lane end of the ground, firstly outside the ground, and secondly inside the ground where the tunnel was situated. To prevent fans being crushed against the wall outside, or the collapse of a wall, the gates were opened by the police, but all this did was to transfer the build up of pressure at the terrace via the tunnel. fans trying to get into an already crowded terrace were responsible in many ways for crushing their own supporters, although there were errors made on the part of the police, at the end of the day, the police were not the ones pressing forward on the backs of other fans in front of them, it was the fans themselves. Yes, gates at the front should have been opened to help  relieve the pressure, but mass hysteria by the fans wanting to see the game was a major factor in the cause of the disaster...

[mike tesko]

It's time that those Liverpool fans who went out of control inside the ground faced up to the responsibility for what they did...

[mike tesko]

Equally, the police at whf who shot Sheila and stage managed her body should come clean and admit what they did and have done...

[ngb1066]

This image is of Sheila Caffell, wearing the very same nightdress that PC Bird photographed her in at the scene from 10 O'clock, onwards. It is not an actress playing Sheila, and considering that Sheila's autopsy was carried out on the day of the tragedy (7th August 1985), how could she have been photographed on any other day wearing the same nightdress, and her face and neck showing evidence of the same general blood running from her mouth and across her throat, with additional blood there for good measure? How can anyone doubt that this image was taken on 7th August 1985, and broadcast in the tv footage...

Notice format / quality of image...

This picture is of Sheila.

[jon]

It's time that those Liverpool fans who went out of control inside the ground faced up to the responsibility for what they did...

Utter , utter shite !!

[scipio_usmc]

This image is of Sheila Caffell, wearing the very same nightdress that PC Bird photographed her in at the scene from 10 O'clock, onwards. It is not an actress playing Sheila, and considering that Sheila's autopsy was carried out on the day of the tragedy (7th August 1985), how could she have been photographed on any other day wearing the same nightdress, and her face and neck showing evidence of the same general blood running from her mouth and across her throat, with additional blood there for good measure? How can anyone doubt that this image was taken on 7th August 1985, and broadcast in the tv footage...

Notice format / quality of image...

But it is not a photo of her sans blood and clearly having only 1 bullet wound like you claimed at the beginning of this thread.  This whole thread was started because you claimed to have a photo of her with only 1 wound and no blood around her mouth.

You constantly engage in what we refer to in the States as a bait and switch.

[petey]

Hiding from the truth never got anyone anywhere...

The photo's I posted are of Sheila, and at Hillsboro' some fans were to blame for some of the deaths in the crush...

Oh dear oh dear. I hope that you don't realise how hurtful your posts are and are making such posts in a naïve manner, as opposed to in a vindictive way.

Obviously you haven't read the Hillsborough Independent Panel Report or listened to the countless apologies made to Liverpool FC and their fans by PM David Cameron, SYP, The Sun.....

For the final time LFC supporters were unequivocally 100% not to blame!

For some bizarre reason you decide that you, Mike Tesko, know far better than everybody else and choose to blame Liverpool fans. Once again you have gone beyond the pale.

I await your apology for the hurt you have caused to myself and thousands and thousands of people with your insensitive, hurtful posts. Sadly I don't think that you are the kind of person that will ever admit they are wrong even when it is so patently obvious.

JFT96

[marty]

Unfortunately, I don't think Mike can see the wood for the trees at the moment.

[lookout]

There's nothing more that any of us can say or do until we hear anything about the next submission.

Mike has put a lot into this forum with his research and knowledge of the case and we mustn't forget that. Sometimes under worrying conditions when his wife was ill and he himself not 100%,as well as a tragedy in the family,so I think he does very well indeed under the circumstances.

Would YOU ever " see the wood for the trees " under the same conditions,Marty ? I think not !! 

[marty]

Lookout, I would work out what was more important in my life with all those problems and things going on ....this forum would be at the bottom of the pile. I don't doubt the work Mike has put in as I have read a lot of his posts and threads and commend him for a lot of past endeavours. Looking in from afar for a while now though I'm not surprised he has not been 100% cos his part or obsession with the forum, case,and being correct about everything,I don't think can be good for him.

Honestly not having a pop its just the way it's coming across.

[lookout]

Okay Martin.

[Reader]

It's time that those Liverpool fans . . .

This topic is about images taken of (or representing) Sheila or June, and it is inappropriate to switch subject to a different disaster, especially without even changing the title.

On the original subject, mike tesko has told us of two images of Sheila on the bed, one being a copy of a photograph he sent to Jeremy, and the other being an image shown to him by an informant, a copy of which (or perhaps the original) was asserted to have been handed in to the CCRC. So, mike tesko, have you ever made or acquired a copy of that second photograph? If not, why is that? Does your informant want it to remain undisclosed (except to the CCRC), at least for the time being? With regard to your copy of the photograph you sent to Jeremy, are you taking any steps to retrieve this so that you can publish it here, as you originally suggested?

[scipio_usmc]

This topic is about images taken of (or representing) Sheila or June, and it is inappropriate to switch subject to a different disaster, especially without even changing the title.

On the original subject, mike tesko has told us of two images of Sheila on the bed, one being a copy of a photograph he sent to Jeremy, and the other being an image shown to him by an informant, a copy of which (or perhaps the original) was asserted to have been handed in to the CCRC. So, mike tesko, have you ever made or acquired a copy of that second photograph? If not, why is that? Does your informant want it to remain undisclosed (except to the CCRC), at least for the time being? With regard to your copy of the photograph you sent to Jeremy, are you taking any steps to retrieve this so that you can publish it here, as you originally suggested?

I found his informant it is secret squirrel:

[Reader]

Would you agree that both bodies shown in the photographic still taken from the crime scene video, are:

(1) - A male and a female
(2) - A male and a male
(3) - A female and a female...

No, because it's a still from a TV documentary, not from a video of the crime scene. One can see that a chest of drawers is present, not the bedside unit that was in the bedroom in WHF. Also, the only "real" images of the interior of WHF used in that documentary were stills that were already released.

[mike tesko]

No, because it's a still from a TV documentary, not from a video of the crime scene. One can see that a chest of drawers is present, not the bedside unit that was in the bedroom in WHF. Also, the only "real" images of the interior of WHF used in that documentary were stills that were already released.

Images are of Sheila - here is another image of Sheila broadcast in same tv documentary:-