Author Topic: Photographic still image taken from crime scene video - The shocking truth...  (Read 75520 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
The documentary was filmed using a modern format, which incorporated the original format and quality of the photographic image taken from the crime scene video filmed on 7th August 1985. The face of the second female and rifle has been superimposed using special effects, which is just an illusion. What the key issue is, who the female in the foreground was / is...
« Last Edit: February 08, 2015, 09:15:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
We know that the ccrc have got one of the crime scene video tapes, which they say Jeremy is not allowed to see - but they don' have the other parts of the video footage taken at the scene on that same morning. More worryingly, is the fact that despite almost 30 years having elapsed since the time of the tragedy on 7th August 1985, no-one has owned up to taken ng the video footage at the scene that morning. But somebody performed that duty, and other police officers in attendance at the scene witnessed the filming of the scene between 9am and 11.10am. Arguably the video footage that was taken was important evidence, and if it contained the same scenes as those photographed by PC Bird from 10 O'clock onwards, there should be no reason why Jeremy can't see the crime scene video footage. What this suggests in the strongest possible terms is that the video footage shows something very different to the images taken by PC Bird from 10am that morning, or in other words, it shows the police set the scene for PC Bird to photograph..,
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
The documentary was filmed using a modern format, which incorporated the original format and quality of the photographic image taken from the crime scene video filmed on 7th August 1985. The face of the second female and rifle has been superimposed using special effects, which is just an illusion. What the key issue is, who the female in the foreground was / is...

An actress, they both are.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
There has been two fundamental alterations between the dark image (a) I posted, and the light version of image (a) :-

(1) - the original dark version (a) was recorded in a different format with corresponding quality during the 1985 era, which shows only the face of one female, with no body, and a small part of what appears to be part of a second body...

(2) - the altered version of image (a) is lighter and shows the faces of two females in the same image...

What is required, is a dark version of the light image (a) which purports to show both faces of the two females, so that everyone can see two female faces in (1) the dark image (a), and (2) the light version of image (a). What we have got at the moment, is a dark version of image (a) which only shows the face of one of the females, and a light version of image (a) which shows the faces of two females...

Mike watch the video, you can see the light change as the camera moves. I have contacted the programme makers and those involved in the reconstructions and they have confirmed that ALL images are reconstructions using actresses and NO REAL FOOTAGE was used. They were given no real footage from police.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
I didn't think that anything " real " would have been used. At least without permission from living relatives,which wouldn't have been granted anyway.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
I didn't think that anything " real " would have been used. At least without permission from living relatives,which wouldn't have been granted anyway.

Well, there is that but such video's would belong to the police and they just wouldn't release then for this kind of show,  if at all.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Well, there is that but such video's would belong to the police and they just wouldn't release then for this kind of show,  if at all.





In case it wasn't as how it should/would have looked ? ;D

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076




In case it wasn't as how it should/would have looked ? ;D

Whatever the reason - it still stands that these pictures are from a reconstruction, with actresses.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Whatever the reason - it still stands that these pictures are from a reconstruction, with actresses.




I actually realised that from the start.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076



I actually realised that from the start.

So did I and said so, why didn't you?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Who took the crime scene video footage at the scene? When did filming commence? How many tapes were used in the filming of the crime scene? 
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
So did I and said so, why didn't you?




I didn't think I had to ?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076



I didn't think I had to ?

You don't but if it had been something a guilty supporter posted, you (and quite a few others) would have been all over it.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
You don't but if it had been something a guilty supporter posted, you (and quite a few others) would have been all over it.




Not necessarily.Get a grip girl.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Mike watch the video, you can see the light change as the camera moves. I have contacted the programme makers and those involved in the reconstructions and they have confirmed that ALL images are reconstructions using actresses and NO REAL FOOTAGE was used. They were given no real footage from police.

You have been misled, because other footage taken on the same day as the tragedy at whf was also incorporated into the TV documentary, filmed on 7th August 1985, and actors did not play any part in those scenes. police sealing off Pages Lane by use of police cars on the day of the incident was real time footage, so whoever you have been contacting and getting answers from, is pulling the wool over your eyes...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...