Photographic still image taken from crime scene video - The shocking truth...

[Alias]

June?

[Jane]

June?

 

Sheila?

 

[Alias]

 



 

Well, that is what Mike is claiming.....

[Jane]

Well, that is what Mike is claiming.....

But WE are not :D :D :D

[Mr. Gee]

June?

Neither June nor Sheila. That's the actress girl who played Sheila in the documentary.

[mike tesko]

The image has been tampered with, so now perform the same exercise with the female in the foreground of image (a)...

[Alias]

The image has been tampered with, so now perform the same exercise with the female in the foreground of image (a)...

I have not tampered with the pictures! The only thing I have done is take (a little better - it´s about the right timing, meaning when exactly you stop the video) screen shots from the documentary. Anybody can do it - it is there, so please have a look. The footage is at 34:02 and a little forward.

They use some light flashes for effect in the video, that is why the picture of the lady in the foreground is much darker than the one of the girl in the background. Have a look.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=u-OlvzCVrmc

[lookout]

When I think about it,even the " proper  ?" pic of Sheila is far too clean to be true,as I have to wonder after killing those people,why she isn't literally up to her eyes in blood which would have catapulted off those who she'd killed. The splashes from wounds at such close quarters would have rendered her looking like June. ? It's not unusual for the shooter to have ended up being as splattered as the rest.
Then again,it IS believed that Sheila was in a mess once at the mortuary.

[lookout]

Sheila HAD to have had a shower after the killings. Otherwise it was impossible for her to have ended up " bloodless ".

[lookout]

 The clothing which was in soak would have belonged to Sheila as well as the boys,as unless she'd haemorrhaged,which I'd have doubted very much,then there was an abnormal amount of blood in those buckets.
Had there only have been a small amount,it would have settled to the bottom of the bucket.   

[Caroline]

I have not pampered with the pictures! The only thing I have done is take (a little better - it´s about the right timing, meaning when exactly you stop the video) screen shots from the documentary. Anybody can do it - it is there, so please have a look. The footage is at 34:02 and a little forward.

They use some light flashes for effect in the video, that is why the picture of the lady in the foreground is much darker than the one of the girl in the background. Have a look.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=u-OlvzCVrmc

The pictures haven't been tampered with at all. There is a lighting change from the picture of the actress playing June and the camera panning to the actress playing Sheila.

[Jane]

The pictures haven't been tampered with at all. There is a lighting change from the picture of the actress playing June and the camera panning to the actress playing Sheila.

Caroline, I can see the end of a rifle near the actress at the "back" of the picture so it is clearly she who is playing Sheila. The older actress at the front -in the foreground- is playing the part of June.

[Caroline]

Caroline, I can see the end of a rifle near the actress at the "back" of the picture so it is clearly she who is playing Sheila. The older actress at the front -in the foreground- is playing the part of June.

Yes, that's right. The woman at the back, it's clearly a LOT younger than the other.

[Jane]

Yes, that's right. The woman at the back, it's clearly a LOT younger than the other.

And even MORE clearly, ISN'T Sheila.

[mike tesko]

Images have been altered by changes...