Photographic still image taken from crime scene video - The shocking truth...

[Jane]

What do you think, April? Do you think we believed it?

Alias, I DON'T regard either of you as being stupid but I know how difficult it is to see reason when emotions are involved. There was a time when I would have willingly believed it.

[susan]

Alias you will never be banned from this forum you are only saying what most of us are thinking I am not angry more sad if anything.

[Caroline]

If SKY NEWS doean't contact me by 9.30pm tonightI won't bw posting thw still image spoken about

Not sure what SKY news has to do with anything, the forum is now closed to outsiders so you could post it just for the regular members who I think deserve to see it - IF it exists, because they have given a lot of time and effort to defending Jeremy - you also have a chance (IF it exists) to stick two fingers up to all those who ever doubted you.

However, I suspect it won't be making an appearance any time soon.

[Caroline]

We sometimes use the phrase up here.  It just means 'anything'.  I was down Osmotherley recently, near Northallerton.  Nice neck of the woods.

My friend used to live there - is that where they do 'the light weight walk'?

[Caroline]

A condition of me posting the still photograph on our forum, is that SKY NEWS contacts me by email tonight before 9.30pm, so that mention of it can be made during a news bulletin which councides with the posting on our forum...

Can someone contact SKY  NEWS to make these arrangements...

The claim of the photograph is yours so any contact with anyone should be from you.

[Alias]

Alias you will never be banned from this forum you are only saying what most of us are thinking I am not angry more sad if anything.

Thank you, Susan.

[lookout]

 I haven't said anything.

[Mr. Gee]

 I KNOW how much you both wanted it to, but did either of you REALLY believe this was going to happen?

As you can see from my very first post April the answer is a resounding NO. But at the back of my mind I still trusted Mike. But right now I declare this to be a complete betrayal of trust towards those who look up to him. In my heart of hearts I didn't think that he would treat us like fawning ignorant monkeys. I am exyremely angry at this tom foolery.

[Jane]

I haven't said anything.

You don't have to, Lookout. I'm sure we all know how you feel.

[lookout]

You don't have to, Lookout. I'm sure we all know how you feel.

Middle name--------philosophical.

[Alias]

I agree . This is doing a lot of damage to the forum and also Mike I m afraid to say your reputation .Which is a shame because you have done a huge amount of work and studied a lot of documents over the years and I can not see why you would do this. You know there are people you could trust to see the photo . And also If it was a condition you posted it on the forum then trust me it would soon get to the press if it was genuine. And Why don't your "informants " want it to go to the legal team?

Good post, Jan.
Mike has put so many years into this case, he has done a humongous job and has a vast knowledge. You are right, it is a shame.

[Jane]

As you can see from my very first post April the answer is a resounding NO. But at the back of my mind I still trusted Mike. But right now I declare this to be a complete betrayal of trust towards those who look up to him. In my heart of hearts I didn't think that he would treat us like fawning ignorant monkeys. I am exyremely angry at this tom foolery.

Grahame, it sounds as if you're saying that previously you had hope but now it feels as if it's been taken away.

[susan]

lookout I for one think you are astute enough not to believe everything you read you will do as I do sit and wait and not judge

[lookout]

 Yes,Susan,or make a joke of it in my own way.

[susan]

lookout quite right always the best way