Author Topic: Bamber at WHF on the night:  (Read 2286 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44395
Bamber at WHF on the night:
« on: January 20, 2015, 04:28:AM »
Bamber's actions on the night were wildly erratic. Lots of untruths were told.

Upon arriving at WHF he immediately set about insinuating Sheila. Rather unfairly calling her a nutter, looney do lally and saying she should be locked up.  He has since claimed he did not understand her illness. You bet he didn't.

Quite why Bamber told the police Sheila knew how to use all weapons inside WHF, I do not know. He later testified she had limited experience with guns. Although there is a strong argument she had no experience.

After a stroll around WHF and a trick of the light, it was time for a sit down in a police car  and a chat about Porsche's.  Bamber forgetting to tell the police there is a way into WHF through windows ( he did not have a front door key). He made no attempt to get the police to speed up their actions.

A nice diagram was drawn up for the police before Julie was informed 'I've only got one 10p. A police car is coming to pick you up'.

Officers have said how calm Bamber was throughout this period. He certainly was not 'coming quickly' into WHF which Neville had asked him to do in his 'mysterious' phone call.

After being informed of the massacre, Bamber seemed upset and sobbed, drinking tea, requesting whisky was included.   Going into the fields and attempting (but failing) to be sick. Returning with some flowers in his hands, saying they are for his (now dead) family.

He then told an officer Sheila had committed child abuse on the twins. Which he had not reported.

The sobbing briefly stopped when asked about the dog. A dog messing up his stereo equipment ? I don't think so.

Despite the shock, Bamber was ok to drive back to his cottage. Then make breakfast before giving his statement to the police.

Do other people agree Bamber's actions at WHF were erratic ?
« Last Edit: February 10, 2015, 05:34:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: Bamber at WHF on the night:
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2015, 10:20:AM »
Do I think his actions were erratic? Yes I do and I suspects yours and mine would be as well in a similar situation. In fact the night my stepfather died and I was the only one to take charge I remember doing and saying some strange things, simply because I suddenlt found myself in an unknown and scary situation. Try not to judge people too harshly Adam, as I rather suspect that you may also find yourself in a similar place yourself one day if you continue to judge people's actions like that?

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Bamber at WHF on the night:
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2015, 05:17:PM »
I am thinking  giving the forum a rest for a while . Adams threads are like groundhog day. It does not matter how much actual "evidence " you give him he just ignores it.

So just to make it clear - it is Adams repetitive threads that are putting me off - NOTHING else .

I have not changed my opinion at all.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Bamber at WHF on the night:
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2015, 05:23:PM »
Jan I am so sorry to hear that as you make some great posts.  If Adam is getting to you just ignore him ;D

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Bamber at WHF on the night:
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2015, 05:27:PM »
I am thinking  giving the forum a rest for a while . Adams threads are like groundhog day. It does not matter how much actual "evidence " you give him he just ignores it.

So just to make it clear - it is Adams repetitive threads that are putting me off - NOTHING else .

I have not changed my opinion at all.

Sorry to hear that. The question is, are you playing right into his hand? This is what he wants I suspect. I think he knows what he is doing by being so ANNOYINGLY repetitive.
Repetition is used in torture, so is enforcing trivial and absurd demands. "Source please"...
Torture.

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: Bamber at WHF on the night:
« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2015, 05:31:PM »
I am thinking  giving the forum a rest for a while . Adams threads are like groundhog day. It does not matter how much actual "evidence " you give him he just ignores it.

So just to make it clear - it is Adams repetitive threads that are putting me off - NOTHING else .

I have not changed my opinion at all.
Hi Jan my friend hope your not leaving now i have come back. 

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Bamber at WHF on the night:
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2015, 05:31:PM »
I am thinking  giving the forum a rest for a while . Adams threads are like groundhog day. It does not matter how much actual "evidence " you give him he just ignores it.

So just to make it clear - it is Adams repetitive threads that are putting me off - NOTHING else .

I have not changed my opinion at all.





I'm afraid I feel the same Jan and if I don't walk away,I'm going to end up saying something that I'll be sorry for as I've reached the end of my tether now,enough is enough.
Contrary to what others might say or think,but I say that he's got a method in his madness and I know I'm going to be proved right.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Bamber at WHF on the night:
« Reply #7 on: January 20, 2015, 05:34:PM »
I would be really sorry to see you go Jan - why don't you just put him on ignore and not read his threads?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: Bamber at WHF on the night:
« Reply #8 on: January 20, 2015, 05:57:PM »
I am thinking  giving the forum a rest for a while . Adams threads are like groundhog day. It does not matter how much actual "evidence " you give him he just ignores it.

So just to make it clear - it is Adams repetitive threads that are putting me off - NOTHING else .

I have not changed my opinion at all.


Jan,if you're determined to take this step -and I TRULY hope we can change you mind- may I suggest that you formally put your reasons for doing so in a pm to the mods. I think you'll have the support of all the active members here. In the meantime, perhaps you could do as Caroline suggests and put him on ignore.

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: Bamber at WHF on the night:
« Reply #9 on: January 20, 2015, 07:29:PM »
I am thinking  giving the forum a rest for a while . Adams threads are like groundhog day. It does not matter how much actual "evidence " you give him he just ignores it.

So just to make it clear - it is Adams repetitive threads that are putting me off - NOTHING else .

I have not changed my opinion at all.
Jan don't do that. Adam is not the only person on the forum. There are intelligent people who are more important.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Bamber at WHF on the night:
« Reply #10 on: January 20, 2015, 07:57:PM »
I know there are no rules against repetitiveness, no rules against sarcasm and no rules against creating new threads all the fukkin time; but I think Adam´s conduct verges on bullying most of the time.
I feel that Jan has been bullied out of here. "Firefighting", hearing fire engines - such little things said again and again and again and again and again. I would liken it to Chinese water torture - it is bullying, and Adam knows it.
Not fair towards Jan or anyone else on this board.

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Bamber at WHF on the night:
« Reply #11 on: January 20, 2015, 08:29:PM »
I will have words.

Please do not think for one minute your views have not been noted because they have. Unfortunately we are a bit thin on the ground and I am so busy at the moment dealing with cases, that I have not got the time to read every post. No excuse I know, but that is how it is at the moment.

I do know that you all wish that Adam would not make so many threads so I will ask him not to make any at all for the time being, this will give some breathing space at least.

Jan please do not leave you are valued member and we need your brilliance in debating the case.  I am sorry you feel like you do.

That is all I can say. Sorry.  :(

 

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Bamber at WHF on the night:
« Reply #12 on: January 20, 2015, 09:07:PM »
Patti that was a lovely post to Jan sent from the heart :)  You are doing a great job and you cannot read every post and I am sure Jan understands this. Jan contributes so much to the forum and it would be sad to loose her Adam puts so much into his posts also but does loose his way from time to time think you should put him on a leash ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Bamber at WHF on the night:
« Reply #13 on: January 20, 2015, 09:14:PM »
Patti that was a lovely post to Jan sent from the heart :)  You are doing a great job and you cannot read every post and I am sure Jan understands this. Jan contributes so much to the forum and it would be sad to loose her Adam puts so much into his posts also but does loose his way from time to time think you should put him on a leash ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Ha! Jan wont leave this place is so addictive and Lookout wont leave either or I will slap her wrists.... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: Bamber at WHF on the night:
« Reply #14 on: January 20, 2015, 09:37:PM »
I know there are no rules against repetitiveness, no rules against sarcasm and no rules against creating new threads all the fukkin time; but I think Adam´s conduct verges on bullying most of the time.
I feel that Jan has been bullied out of here. "Firefighting", hearing fire engines - such little things said again and again and again and again and again. I would liken it to Chinese water torture - it is bullying, and Adam knows it.
Not fair towards Jan or anyone else on this board.
Yet there is just a little spark that is made much of.